• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区分红毛猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)、黑猩猩(黑猩猩)和人类儿童(智人)的有意行为和偶然行为。

Distinguishing intentional from accidental actions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and human children (Homo sapiens).

作者信息

Call J, Tomasello M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Emory University, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 1998 Jun;112(2):192-206. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.112.2.192.

DOI:10.1037/0735-7036.112.2.192
PMID:9642787
Abstract

This study investigates the understanding of others' intentions in 2- and 3-year-old children, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). During training, subjects learned to use a discriminative cue to select a baited box. During testing, the experimenter placed a marker on top of the baited box to inform the subject of the reward's location. However, the experimenter also accidentally dropped the marker on top of an unbaited box, so that during any given trial the experimenter marked 2 boxes, 1 intentionally and 1 accidentally. All 3 species preferentially selected the box the experimenter had marked intentionally (especially during the initial trials), with 3-year-old children presenting the most robust results. These findings suggest that subjects understood something about the experimenter's intentions. The authors speculate that understanding of others' intentions may precede the understanding of others' beliefs both at the ontogenetic and phylogenetic levels.

摘要

本研究调查了2岁和3岁儿童、黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)及红毛猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)对他人意图的理解。在训练过程中,受试者学会使用辨别线索来选择装有诱饵的盒子。在测试过程中,实验者在装有诱饵的盒子顶部放置一个标记,以告知受试者奖励的位置。然而,实验者也不小心将标记掉落在了未装诱饵的盒子顶部,因此在任何给定的试验中,实验者标记了2个盒子,1个是故意标记的,1个是不小心标记的。所有这3个物种都优先选择实验者故意标记的盒子(尤其是在最初的试验中),3岁儿童的结果最为明显。这些发现表明,受试者理解了关于实验者意图的某些信息。作者推测,在个体发育和系统发育层面,对他人意图的理解可能先于对他人信念的理解。

相似文献

1
Distinguishing intentional from accidental actions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and human children (Homo sapiens).区分红毛猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)、黑猩猩(黑猩猩)和人类儿童(智人)的有意行为和偶然行为。
J Comp Psychol. 1998 Jun;112(2):192-206. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.112.2.192.
2
Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (Homo sapiens).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)、一只猩猩(Pongo pygmaeus)和人类婴儿(Homo sapiens)在物体选择任务中对实验者给出线索的运用。
J Comp Psychol. 1998 Jun;112(2):119-26. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.112.2.119.
3
The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task.倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)、黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)和红毛猩猩(Pongo pygmaeus)在两种版本的物体选择任务中的表现。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):304-9. doi: 10.1037/a0016222.
4
Direct and indirect reputation formation in nonhuman great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) and human children (Homo sapiens).非人类的大型猿类(倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩、红毛猩猩)和人类儿童(智人)中直接和间接声誉的形成。
J Comp Psychol. 2013 Feb;127(1):63-75. doi: 10.1037/a0028929. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
5
Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens).红毛猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)、黑猩猩(黑猩猩)和儿童(智人)的客体永久性。
J Comp Psychol. 2001 Jun;115(2):159-71. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.159.
6
Referential understanding of videos in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), and children (Homo sapiens).黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)、猩猩(红毛猩猩属)和儿童(智人)对视频的参照理解。
J Comp Psychol. 2003 Dec;117(4):420-8. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.4.420.
7
Learning from others' mistakes? limits on understanding a trap-tube task by young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens).从他人的错误中学习?幼年黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)和儿童(智人)理解诱捕管任务的局限性。
J Comp Psychol. 2007 Feb;121(1):12-21. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.1.12.
8
'Unwilling' versus 'unable': chimpanzees' understanding of human intentional action.“不愿意”与“无能力”:黑猩猩对人类有意行为的理解
Dev Sci. 2004 Sep;7(4):488-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00368.x.
9
Apes' use of iconic cues in the object-choice task.猿类在物体选择任务中对标志性线索的运用。
Anim Cogn. 2006 Apr;9(2):118-30. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0013-4. Epub 2006 Jan 5.
10
Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange.大猩猩(西部大猩猩、婆罗洲猩猩、倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩)之间的代币转移:物种差异、手势请求和互惠交换。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):375-84. doi: 10.1037/a0017253.

引用本文的文献

1
Theory of mind in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review.轻度认知障碍患者的心理理论:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 18;13:994070. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.994070. eCollection 2022.
2
The evolutionary origins of syntax: Event cognition in nonhuman primates.句法的进化起源:非人类灵长类动物的事件认知。
Sci Adv. 2022 Jun 24;8(25):eabn8464. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn8464. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Inferential Communication: Bridging the Gap Between Intentional and Ostensive Communication in Non-human Primates.
推理交流:弥合非人类灵长类动物有意交流与明示交流之间的差距
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 14;12:718251. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718251. eCollection 2021.
4
Theory of mind tested by implicit false belief: a simple and full-fledged mental state attribution.内隐错误信念任务检验心理理论:一种简单而成熟的心理状态归因。
FEBS J. 2022 Dec;289(23):7343-7358. doi: 10.1111/febs.16322. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
5
The psychological foundations of reputation-based cooperation.基于声誉的合作的心理学基础。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200287. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0287. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
6
Five Breakthroughs: A First Approximation of Brain Evolution From Early Bilaterians to Humans.五大突破:从早期两侧对称动物到人类大脑进化的初步近似
Front Neuroanat. 2021 Aug 17;15:693346. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2021.693346. eCollection 2021.
7
What Behavioral Abilities Emerged at Key Milestones in Human Brain Evolution? 13 Hypotheses on the 600-Million-Year Phylogenetic History of Human Intelligence.人类大脑进化关键节点出现了哪些行为能力?关于人类智力6亿年系统发育史的13种假说。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 29;12:685853. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685853. eCollection 2021.
8
Intention Attribution and the Development of Moral Evaluation.意图归因与道德评价的发展
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 7;9:2663. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02663. eCollection 2018.
9
Chimpanzees gesture to humans in mirrors: using reflection to dissociate seeing from line of gaze.黑猩猩在镜子前向人类做手势:利用反射来区分视觉与视线方向。
Anim Behav. 2018 Jan;135:239-249. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
10
Social play as joint action: A framework to study the evolution of shared intentionality as an interactional achievement.作为联合行动的社交游戏:一个将共享意向性的演变作为互动成果进行研究的框架。
Learn Behav. 2017 Dec;45(4):390-405. doi: 10.3758/s13420-017-0287-9.