• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用经合组织推荐的阳性对照致敏剂,在豚鼠最大化试验中检测皮肤致敏潜力的性别差异比较。

Comparison of sex differences in guinea-pig maximization test for detection of skin-sensitizing potential using OECD recommended positive control sensitizers.

作者信息

Nakamura Y, Higaki T, Kato H, Kishida F, Nakatsuka I

机构信息

Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. Environmental Health Science Laboratory, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Toxicol Sci. 1998 May;23(2):105-11. doi: 10.2131/jts.23.2_105.

DOI:10.2131/jts.23.2_105
PMID:9644650
Abstract

Both male and female guinea pigs are widely used in tests to detect the skin-sensitizing potential of new chemicals. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of the animal gender on sensitization rates, with the guinea-pig maximization test (GPMT) using OECD recommended positive control sensitizers, and the differences of the density of Langerhans cells in male and female guinea pigs. The sensitization rates of males and females challenged with HCA, MBT or benzocaine gave almost the same results. There were no statistical differences between the mean responses of males and females. These results were confirmed by rechallenge with the OECD recommended positive controls. Furthermore, the density of Langerhans cells in abdominal epidermis in males (1229 +/- 45 cells/mm2) was the same as that in females (1242 +/- 89 cells/mm2). These results indicate that there is no significant influence of guinea-pig gender in the assessment of skin-sensitizing potential using the GPMT.

摘要

雄性和雌性豚鼠都被广泛用于检测新化学物质皮肤致敏潜力的试验中。本研究的目的是利用经合组织推荐的阳性对照致敏剂,通过豚鼠最大化试验(GPMT),研究动物性别对致敏率的影响,以及雄性和雌性豚鼠朗格汉斯细胞密度的差异。用六氯环戊二烯(HCA)、巯基苯并噻唑(MBT)或苯佐卡因攻击的雄性和雌性豚鼠的致敏率几乎相同。雄性和雌性的平均反应之间没有统计学差异。经合组织推荐的阳性对照物再次攻击证实了这些结果。此外,雄性豚鼠腹部表皮中朗格汉斯细胞的密度(1229±45个细胞/mm²)与雌性(1242±89个细胞/mm²)相同。这些结果表明,在使用GPMT评估皮肤致敏潜力时,豚鼠性别没有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of sex differences in guinea-pig maximization test for detection of skin-sensitizing potential using OECD recommended positive control sensitizers.使用经合组织推荐的阳性对照致敏剂,在豚鼠最大化试验中检测皮肤致敏潜力的性别差异比较。
J Toxicol Sci. 1998 May;23(2):105-11. doi: 10.2131/jts.23.2_105.
2
Results with OECD recommended positive control sensitizers in the maximization, Buehler and local lymph node assays.经合组织推荐的阳性对照致敏剂在最大化试验、布勒试验和局部淋巴结试验中的结果。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Jan;31(1):63-7. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(93)90181-w.
3
Skin sensitization testing: the relevance of rechallenge and pretreatment with sodium lauryl sulfate in the guinea pig maximization test.皮肤致敏试验:在豚鼠最大化试验中再次激发和用十二烷基硫酸钠预处理的相关性。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1997 Sep;35(9):923-6. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)88939-9.
4
Comparison of the sensitivities of the Buehler test and the guinea pig maximization test for predictive testing of contact allergy.
Acta Derm Venereol. 2000 Jul-Aug;80(4):256-62. doi: 10.1080/000155500750012126.
5
The value and limitations of rechallenge in the guinea pig maximization test.豚鼠最大化试验中再激发的价值与局限性。
Contact Dermatitis. 1996 Sep;35(3):135-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02330.x.
6
An evaluation of the suitability of benzocaine as a positive control skin sensitizer.对苯佐卡因作为阳性对照皮肤致敏剂适用性的评估。
Contact Dermatitis. 1995 Jul;33(1):28-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00443.x.
7
The guinea pig maximization test--with a multiple dose design.豚鼠最大化试验——采用多剂量设计。
Acta Derm Venereol. 1995 Nov;75(6):463-9. doi: 10.2340/0001555575463469.
8
Experimental study for the development of an in vitro test for contact allergens. 2. Comparison of the in vitro sensitization test with the guinea pig maximization test for contact allergens.接触性变应原体外试验开发的实验研究。2. 接触性变应原体外致敏试验与豚鼠最大化试验的比较。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1998 Mar;115(3):228-34. doi: 10.1159/000023905.
9
Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.用于效能和风险评估的皮肤致敏试验
Toxicol Sci. 2001 Feb;59(2):198-208. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/59.2.198.
10
Effect of simultaneous exposure to mixture of two skin sensitizers on skin sensitization response in guinea pigs and mice.同时接触两种皮肤致敏剂混合物对豚鼠和小鼠皮肤致敏反应的影响。
J Toxicol Sci. 2014 Feb;39(1):163-71. doi: 10.2131/jts.39.163.