Shimada S D, Robertson R N, Bonninger M L, Cooper R A
Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15261, USA.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1998 Jun;35(2):210-8.
Rehabilitation scientists and biomedical engineers have been investigating wheelchair propulsion biomechanics in order to prevent musculoskeletal injuries. Several studies have investigated wheelchair propulsion biomechanics; however, few have examined wheelchair propulsion stroke patterns. The purpose of this study was to characterize wheelchair propulsion stroke patterns by investigating joint accelerations, joint range of motions, wheelchair propulsion phases, and stroke efficiency. Seven experienced wheelchair users (5 males, 2 females) were filmed using a three-camera motion analysis system. Each subject pushed a standard wheelchair fitted with a force-sensing pushrim (SMARTWheel) at two speeds (1.3 and 2.2 m/s). The elbow angle was analyzed in the sagittal plane, while the shoulder joint was analyzed in the sagittal and frontal planes. Three distinctly different stroke patterns: semi-circular (SC), single looping-over-propulsion (SLOP), and double looping-over-propulsion (DLOP), were identified from the kinematic analysis. Through our analysis of these patterns, we hypothesized that SC was more biomechanically efficient than the other stroke patterns. Future studies using a larger number of subjects and strokes may reveal more significant distinctions in efficiency measures between stroke patterns.
康复科学家和生物医学工程师一直在研究轮椅推进生物力学,以预防肌肉骨骼损伤。已有多项研究对轮椅推进生物力学进行了调查;然而,很少有研究考察轮椅推进的划水模式。本研究的目的是通过研究关节加速度、关节活动范围、轮椅推进阶段和划水效率来描述轮椅推进的划水模式。使用三摄像头运动分析系统对7名经验丰富的轮椅使用者(5名男性,2名女性)进行了拍摄。每位受试者以两种速度(1.3米/秒和2.2米/秒)推动一辆装有力感应轮辋(SMARTWheel)的标准轮椅。在矢状面分析肘关节角度,同时在矢状面和额状面分析肩关节。通过运动学分析确定了三种明显不同的划水模式:半圆形(SC)、单次翻转推进(SLOP)和双次翻转推进(DLOP)。通过对这些模式的分析,我们假设SC在生物力学上比其他划水模式更有效。未来使用更多受试者和划水次数的研究可能会揭示划水模式之间在效率指标上更显著的差异。