Suppr超能文献

特殊与一般。疟疾防治史中的特异性与纵向性问题。

The particular and the general. Issues of specificity and verticality in the history of malaria control.

作者信息

Bradley D J

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

出版信息

Parassitologia. 1998 Jun;40(1-2):5-10.

PMID:9653726
Abstract

Several ideas have currency through long periods of malaria control history and important issues in controlling many communicable diseases have often been fought out over malaria. Health administrators view complex problems of malaria control through these apparently simple ideas. The most important concepts concern the need for specific methods to combat particular features of the spread of malaria and how far this is reflected by the development of specific health services. This paper follows these ideas through the last century and argues that the dead hand of history has played too large a role in determining malaria control generally, and especially over the last two decades, while the whole period provides an illuminating commentary on conceptualization in tropical health and its evolution. The two decades following discovery of the mosquito transmission of malaria saw increasingly specific knowledge about the vectors and approaches to preventing breeding. This required "odd" health workers who poured oil on water and did fresh-water biology and later special engineers who could design reservoirs and irrigation systems hostile to anopheline breeding and apply "species sanitation". The expertise required lay outside the health sector. Later, the DDT phase focused on a single highly specialized control technique, total coverage house spraying, and led on to attempted eradication, whose activities were vertically grouped. Malaria eradication became autonomous within the health department. It became the archetypal vertical programme whose funding levels and early successes made it a model to be emulated. But the need for active case surveillance to be integrated with general health services was a major reason for failure in some countries. The subsequent reaction to failed eradication emphasized horizontal or general health services, and these are very relevant to current pre-occupations with morbidity and mortality reduction by early diagnosis and prompt treatment. The future needs a complex mixture of interventions that cut across traditional views of either specificity or of the horizontal/vertical split in programmes, and development of effective control with imperfect tools requires a more sophisticated analysis of control methods and organizations than is provided by a simple vertical/horizontal debate.

摘要

在疟疾控制的漫长历史中,有几种理念长期存在,而在控制许多传染病的重要问题上,往往围绕疟疾展开了激烈争论。卫生管理人员通过这些看似简单的理念来审视疟疾控制的复杂问题。最重要的概念涉及针对疟疾传播的特定特征采取特定方法的必要性,以及这在多大程度上通过特定卫生服务的发展得以体现。本文回顾了上个世纪的这些理念,并认为历史的束缚在总体上,尤其是在过去二十年中,对疟疾控制产生了过大的影响,而这一时期对热带卫生概念及其演变提供了具有启发性的评论。在发现疟疾由蚊子传播后的二十年里,人们对传播媒介和防止繁殖的方法有了越来越具体的认识。这需要那些像在水面倒油一样做淡水生物学研究的“奇特”卫生工作者,以及后来能够设计不利于按蚊繁殖的水库和灌溉系统并应用“物种卫生学”的专业工程师。所需的专业知识超出了卫生部门的范畴。后来,滴滴涕阶段专注于单一高度专业化的控制技术,即全面室内喷洒,并导致了根除疟疾的尝试,其活动是垂直分组的。疟疾根除在卫生部门内部变得独立。它成为了典型的垂直项目,其资金水平和早期成功使其成为一个值得效仿的模式。但在一些国家,未能将主动病例监测与一般卫生服务相结合是导致失败的一个主要原因。随后对根除失败的反应强调了横向或一般卫生服务,而这些与当前通过早期诊断和及时治疗来降低发病率和死亡率的关注点密切相关。未来需要一系列复杂的干预措施,这些措施要跨越传统的特异性观念或项目中横向/纵向划分的观念,而且利用不完善的工具进行有效控制需要对控制方法和组织进行比简单的横向/纵向争论更复杂的分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验