Massé R, Poulin C, Dassa C, Lambert J, Bélair S, Battaglini A
Département d'anthropologie, Université Laval, Québec.
Can J Public Health. 1998 May-Jun;89(3):183-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03404471.
Psychological distress scales used in epidemiologic surveys usually show high construct validity. The content validation however is less convincing since these scales rest on lists of psychiatric symptoms which are hypothesized as the very content of a psychological distress. This study presents the results of the construct and criterion validation of a new Psychological Distress Manifestations Measure Scale (PDMMS) founded on an initial list of manifestations derived from an original content validation in a general population. Twenty-three items are grouped in four oblique factors with Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.81 and 0.89. High scores on the scale are correlated with psychoactive drugs consumption, visits to health professionals and self-evaluations of psychological health.
流行病学调查中使用的心理困扰量表通常具有较高的结构效度。然而,内容效度却不那么令人信服,因为这些量表基于一系列精神症状清单,而这些症状被假定为心理困扰的核心内容。本研究展示了一种新的心理困扰表现测量量表(PDMMS)的结构效度和效标效度结果,该量表基于从普通人群的原始内容效度中得出的初始表现清单。二十三个项目被归为四个斜交因子,克朗巴哈系数在0.81至0.89之间。该量表的高分与精神活性药物的使用、就医次数以及心理健康的自我评价相关。