Henry S B, Warren J J, Lange L, Button P
Department of Community Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of California-San Francisco, USA. nursing%
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Jul-Aug;5(4):321-8. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050321.
Building on the work of previous authors, the Computer-based Patient Record Institute (CPRI) Work Group on Codes and Structures has described features of a classification scheme for implementation within a computer-based patient record. The authors of the current study reviewed the evaluation literature related to six major nursing vocabularies (the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association Taxonomy 1, the Nursing Interventions Classification, the Nursing Outcomes Classification, the Home Health Care Classification, the Omaha System, and the International Classification for Nursing Practice) to determine the extent to which the vocabularies include the CPRI features. None of the vocabularies met all criteria. The Omaha System, Home Health Care Classification, and International Classification for Nursing Practice each included five features. Criteria not fully met by any systems were clear and non-redundant representation of concepts, administrative cross-references, syntax and grammar, synonyms, uncertainty, context-free identifiers, and language independence.
基于先前作者的工作,基于计算机的患者记录协会(CPRI)编码与结构工作组描述了一种分类方案的特征,以便在基于计算机的患者记录中实施。本研究的作者回顾了与六种主要护理词汇表(北美护理诊断协会分类法第1版、护理干预分类法、护理结果分类法、家庭健康护理分类法、奥马哈系统和国际护理实践分类法)相关的评估文献,以确定这些词汇表包含CPRI特征的程度。没有一个词汇表符合所有标准。奥马哈系统、家庭健康护理分类法和国际护理实践分类法各自包含五个特征。任何系统都未完全满足的标准包括概念的清晰且无冗余表示、管理交叉引用、句法和语法、同义词、不确定性、无上下文标识符以及语言独立性。