Suppr超能文献

贲门失弛缓症的气囊扩张术:气囊扩张时间的前瞻性比较

Pneumatic balloon dilation in achalasia: a prospective comparison of balloon distention time.

作者信息

Khan A A, Shah S W, Alam A, Butt A K, Shafqat F, Castell D O

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Shaikh Zayed Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Jul;93(7):1064-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00330.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Duration of Inflation in pneumatic balloon dilatation as treatment of achalasia has been variable ranging from 15 s to 6 min. A 60 s duration appears to be most often used. We compared the efficacy of dilation of achalasia with either 6- or 60-s inflation duration using a Rigiflex dilator of 3.0 cm diameter.

METHODS

Eighty-one consecutive patients were prospectively studied in a randomized fashion, 41 in the 60-s group (A) and 40 patients in the 6-s group (B). Mean age of group A was 43 +/- 16.2 yr and of group B was 40 +/- 16.4 yr. Symptoms of dysphagia, chest pain, heartburn, regurgitation, and night cough were evaluated at basal (before dilation), 1- and 6-month intervals after dilation in both groups. Barium swallow was done to assess esophageal emptying 1 wk before dilation and 5 min postdilation in both groups.

RESULTS

Significant and sustained improvement was seen for all symptoms in both groups. In addition, the degree of improvement in symptom scores between the two groups was similar. Barium esophagram in both groups at basal and immediately postdilation showed significant improvement in barium emptying but there was no significant difference between the two groups, indicative of equal efficacy in both distention times. Two patients needed repeat dilatation in group A and one in group B, with one drop out from group A, who was lost to follow-up, and was excluded from the analysis. No perforation occurred.

CONCLUSION

Short duration of pneumatic balloon dilatation (6-s) is as effective as longer duration (60-s) in treatment of achalasia.

摘要

目的

在治疗贲门失弛缓症时,气囊扩张术的充气时间长短不一,从15秒到6分钟不等。60秒的充气时间似乎最为常用。我们使用直径3.0厘米的Rigiflex扩张器,比较了充气时间为6秒和60秒时贲门失弛缓症扩张治疗的疗效。

方法

对81例连续患者进行前瞻性随机研究,60秒组(A组)41例,6秒组(B组)40例。A组平均年龄为43±16.2岁,B组平均年龄为40±16.4岁。在两组患者扩张前(基础状态)、扩张后1个月和6个月时,评估吞咽困难、胸痛、烧心、反流和夜间咳嗽等症状。两组患者在扩张前1周和扩张后5分钟均进行钡餐检查以评估食管排空情况。

结果

两组所有症状均有显著且持续的改善。此外,两组症状评分的改善程度相似。两组患者基础状态和扩张后即刻的钡餐食管造影显示钡剂排空有显著改善,但两组之间无显著差异,表明两种扩张时间的疗效相同。A组有2例患者需要重复扩张,B组有1例,A组有1例失访,被排除在分析之外。未发生穿孔。

结论

在治疗贲门失弛缓症时,短时间气囊扩张(6秒)与长时间扩张(60秒)同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验