• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最后习得,最先遗忘:老年人的习得年龄与命名

Last in, first to go: age of acquisition and naming in the elderly.

作者信息

Hodgson C, Ellis A W

机构信息

University of York, York, England.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1998 Aug;64(1):146-63. doi: 10.1006/brln.1998.1960.

DOI:10.1006/brln.1998.1960
PMID:9675047
Abstract

Twenty-six elderly subjects (ages 71-86) and 10 young adult subjects (ages 22-33) named 206 black-and-white line drawings of objects. Although the two groups did not differ significantly on VIQ, the elderly group named significantly fewer of the objects than the younger group (who were almost at ceiling). A regression analysis of the data from the elderly group found effects of both age of acquisition and name agreement on naming accuracy after 5 and 15 s and an effect of word length after 5 but not 15 s. There were no independent effects of picture complexity, object familiarity, word frequency, or imageability. The majority of the elderly subjects' naming errors were semantic in nature, with circumlocutions, visual errors, and "don't know" responses accounting for most of the remaining errors. The implications of the findings for our understanding of word-finding problems in the elderly are discussed.

摘要

26名老年受试者(年龄71 - 86岁)和10名年轻成年受试者(年龄22 - 33岁)为206幅物体的黑白线条画命名。尽管两组在言语智商(VIQ)上没有显著差异,但老年组命名的物体数量明显少于年轻组(年轻组几乎达到上限)。对老年组数据的回归分析发现,习得年龄和名称一致性在5秒和15秒后对命名准确性均有影响,而单词长度仅在5秒后有影响,15秒后则无影响。图片复杂性、物体熟悉度、词频或可想象性均无独立影响。老年受试者的大多数命名错误本质上是语义性的,迂回表达、视觉错误和“不知道”的回答占了其余错误的大部分。本文讨论了这些发现对我们理解老年人找词问题的启示。

相似文献

1
Last in, first to go: age of acquisition and naming in the elderly.最后习得,最先遗忘:老年人的习得年龄与命名
Brain Lang. 1998 Aug;64(1):146-63. doi: 10.1006/brln.1998.1960.
2
Category-specific naming effect in non-brain-damaged individuals.非脑损伤个体中的类别特异性命名效应。
Brain Lang. 2005 Jul;94(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.11.008.
3
Age of acquisition and name agreement as predictors of mean response latencies in picture naming of French adults.习得年龄和名称一致性作为法国成年人图片命名中平均反应潜伏期的预测因素。
Brain Cogn. 2000 Jun-Aug;43(1-3):286-91.
4
Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled.在控制了累积词频和频率轨迹后,习得年龄仍然是图片命名中的主要因素。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jan;60(1):32-42. doi: 10.1080/17470210600577423.
5
Age of acquisition and word frequency in written picture naming.书面图片命名中的习得年龄和词频
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 May;54(2):469-89. doi: 10.1080/713755968.
6
Age of acquisition for naming and knowing: a new hypothesis.命名与认知的习得年龄:一种新假说。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Feb;59(2):268-95. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000674.
7
Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis.图片命名中的习得年龄效应:词汇语义竞争假说的证据。
Cognition. 2005 Jun;96(2):B45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.006. Epub 2005 Jan 25.
8
Age of acquisition, not word frequency affects object recognition: evidence from the effects of visual degradation.习得年龄而非词频影响物体识别:来自视觉退化效应的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
9
Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization.年轻人和年长者在习得年龄上的差异会影响词汇判断和语义分类的反应时。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Mar;124(3):274-95. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.007. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
10
Age of acquisition, ageing, and verb production: normative and experimental data.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 May;56(4):705-30. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000594.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence of Embodiment-based changes in older Adult Language.老年人语言中基于具身化的变化的证据。
Psychol Res. 2025 Sep 30;89(5):151. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02173-6.
2
Humans create more novelty than ChatGPT when asked to retell a story.当被要求复述一个故事时,人类比 ChatGPT 创造出更多的新颖性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 9;14(1):875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50229-7.
3
How cognitive selection affects language change.认知选择如何影响语言变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jan 2;121(1):e2220898120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220898120. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
4
An examination of task factors that influence the associative memory deficit in aging.对影响衰老过程中联想记忆缺陷的任务因素的研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 23;13:991371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991371. eCollection 2022.
5
Diachronic semantic change in language is constrained by how people use and learn language.语言的历时语义变化受到人们使用和学习语言的方式的限制。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Aug;50(6):1284-1298. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01331-0. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
6
Dysfunctional Tissue Correlates of Unrelated Naming Errors in Acute Left Hemisphere Stroke.急性左半球卒中中无关命名错误的功能失调组织相关性
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022;37(3):330-347. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2021.1980593. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
7
Serial Recall Order of Category Fluency Words: Exploring Its Neural Underpinnings.类别流畅性词汇的序列回忆顺序:探索其神经基础。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 6;12:777838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.777838. eCollection 2021.
8
Words with Consistent Diachronic Usage Patterns are Learned Earlier: A Computational Analysis Using Temporally Aligned Word Embeddings.具有一致历时使用模式的单词学得更早:使用时间对齐的词嵌入的计算分析。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Apr;45(4):e12963. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12963.
9
The Role of Word Properties in Performance on Fluency Tasks in People with Primary Progressive Aphasia.在原发性进行性失语症患者的流畅性任务表现中,词的属性的作用。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;68(4):1521-1534. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180990.
10
Judging the animacy of words: The influence of typicality and age of acquisition in a semantic decision task.判断词语的生命性:语义决策任务中典型性和习得年龄的影响
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Oct;70(10):2094-2104. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1223704. Epub 2016 Sep 7.