Bercovich Z
DLO-Institute for Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO), Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Vet Q. 1998 Jul;20(3):81-8. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1998.9694845.
This review covers some epidemiological aspects that allow Brucella to survive, spread, and maintain itself in the environment. Because the success of maintaining Brucella-free herds is determined by the efficiency of the serological tests to detect a single infected animal the limitations of the traditional serological tests are emphasized. Serological tests cannot differentiate between cattle infected with Brucella and cattle infected with microorganisms that serologically cross-react with B. abortus antigen. These cattle and cattle with 'natural' antibodies jeopardize the Brucella-free status of a herd. Likewise, infected cattle with serologically inconclusive test results or which elude detection are also a hazard to Brucella-free herds. Since cattle that elude detection with serological tests and the presence of non-specific serum antibodies in healthy cattle have long been recognized as problems, it is opportune to reconsider the procedures currently used to diagnose brucellosis in individual animals. Use of the skin delayed-type hypersensitivity test in addition to serological tests will significantly improve the diagnosis of brucellosis. This will limit the financial loss incurred by outbreaks of brucellosis.
本综述涵盖了一些流行病学方面的内容,这些内容使得布鲁氏菌能够在环境中存活、传播并维持自身生存。由于维持无布鲁氏菌牛群的成功与否取决于血清学检测发现单头感染动物的效率,因此强调了传统血清学检测的局限性。血清学检测无法区分感染布鲁氏菌的牛和感染与流产布鲁氏菌抗原发生血清学交叉反应的微生物的牛。这些牛以及具有“天然”抗体的牛会危及牛群的无布鲁氏菌状态。同样,血清学检测结果不确定或未被检测出的感染牛也会对无布鲁氏菌牛群构成危害。由于血清学检测难以检测出的牛以及健康牛中存在非特异性血清抗体这两个问题早已为人所知,因此有必要重新考虑目前用于诊断个体动物布鲁氏菌病的程序。除血清学检测外,使用皮肤迟发型超敏反应试验将显著改善布鲁氏菌病的诊断。这将限制布鲁氏菌病暴发造成的经济损失。