Suppr超能文献

手术与内镜检查作为疑似胆总管结石症状性患者的初始治疗:一项多中心随机试验。法国外科研究协会

Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones: a multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research.

作者信息

Suc B, Escat J, Cherqui D, Fourtanier G, Hay J M, Fingerhut A, Millat B

机构信息

Digestive Surgery Units, Hôpital Rangueil, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1998 Jul;133(7):702-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.7.702.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical treatment (ST) with endoscopic management (EM) in patients with suspected common bile duct stones.

PATIENTS

Two hundred twenty eligible patients originating from 18 surgery units. Patients enrolled in this multicenter randomized study had clinical symptoms that included jaundice, mild pancreatitis (Ranson score < or = 2), or mild acute cholangitis; biliary colic (with increased alkaline phosphatase levels); and common bile duct stones or a common bile duct diameter of 1 cm or larger on ultrasonography.

METHODS

Two hundred two patients were randomly assigned to either ST (n=105) or EM (n=97) during a 5-year period. Both groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and clinical presentation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The rates of early postoperative additional procedures necessary to deal with the impossibility to perform the initial procedure, complications, and retained stones after ST or EM. Subsidiary endpoints were intention-to-treat analyses of mortality and of major complications and the duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Surgical treatment was associated with a significantly (P<.001) lower rate of 1 or 2 additional procedures (8% vs 29%) due to a significantly lower rate of the impossibility to perform the initial procedure (0% vs 5%) (P<.05), major complications (4% vs 13%) (P<.05), and retained stones (6% vs 16%) (P<.04). Minor complications occurred more often in patients having ST (4%) than in those having EM (0%) (P<.01). Cholecystectomy was performed routinely in 102 patients having ST and electively in 36 patients having EM. There was 1 death in each group initially. On an intention-to-treat analysis, 3 deaths (3.1%) occurred after EM and 1 (0.9%) after ST; this difference was not statistically significant (P=.56). Major complications occurred in 4% of patients having ST compared with 1 1% of patients having EM (P<.002). The median duration of hospital stay was 16 days in patients having ST and 12 days in those having EM; this difference was not statistically significant (P=.09).

CONCLUSION

Whether an additional cholecystectomy is performed routinely or electively, the high risk of additional procedures after EM precludes its use as the optimal therapy in patients with symptomatic common bile duct stones, except in those with severe cholangitis.

摘要

目的

比较手术治疗(ST)与内镜治疗(EM)对疑似胆总管结石患者的疗效。

患者

来自18个外科单位的220例符合条件的患者。纳入这项多中心随机研究的患者有以下临床症状:黄疸、轻度胰腺炎(兰森评分≤2)或轻度急性胆管炎;胆绞痛(碱性磷酸酶水平升高);超声检查显示胆总管结石或胆总管直径≥1cm。

方法

在5年期间,202例患者被随机分为ST组(n = 105)或EM组(n = 97)。两组在年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会评分和临床表现方面具有可比性。

主要观察指标

ST或EM后因无法完成初始手术、并发症及残留结石而需进行早期术后额外手术的发生率。次要终点为意向性分析的死亡率、主要并发症及住院时间。

结果

由于无法完成初始手术的发生率显著较低(0%对5%)(P <.05)、主要并发症发生率较低(4%对13%)(P <.05)和残留结石发生率较低(6%对16%)(P <.04),手术治疗组因1次或2次额外手术的发生率显著较低(P <.001)(8%对29%)。ST组患者发生轻微并发症的频率(4%)高于EM组患者(0%)(P <.01)。102例接受ST的患者常规进行了胆囊切除术,36例接受EM的患者选择性进行了胆囊切除术。每组最初各有1例死亡。在意向性分析中,EM组术后有3例死亡(3.1%),ST组有1例死亡(0.9%);差异无统计学意义(P =.56)。ST组患者主要并发症发生率为4%,而EM组为11%(P <.002)。ST组患者的中位住院时间为16天,EM组为12天;差异无统计学意义(P =.09)。

结论

无论常规还是选择性进行额外的胆囊切除术,EM后额外手术的高风险使其不能作为有症状胆总管结石患者的最佳治疗方法,严重胆管炎患者除外。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验