• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)暴露疗法的反应:心理挫败与疏离感的作用。

Predicting response to exposure treatment in PTSD: the role of mental defeat and alienation.

作者信息

Ehlers A, Clark D M, Dunmore E, Jaycox L, Meadows E, Foa E B

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, U.K.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 1998 Jul;11(3):457-71. doi: 10.1023/A:1024448511504.

DOI:10.1023/A:1024448511504
PMID:9690187
Abstract

Not all patients with posttraumatic stress disorder benefit from exposure treatment. The present paper describes two cognitive dimensions that are related to inferior response to exposure in rape victims. First, individuals whose memories during relieving of the trauma reflected mental defeat or the absence of mental planning showed little improvement. Second, inferior outcome was correlated with an overall feeling of alienation or permanent change following the trauma. These results are based on blind ratings of transcripts of exposure treatment sessions from 10 women with good outcome and 10 women with inferior outcome. Patients in the two groups were matched for initial symptom severity and were comparable in many aspects of the assault. Patients who experienced mental defeat, alienation, or permanent change may require cognitive restructuring in addition to exposure.

摘要

并非所有创伤后应激障碍患者都能从暴露疗法中获益。本文描述了与强奸受害者对暴露疗法反应较差相关的两个认知维度。首先,那些在创伤缓解过程中的记忆反映出精神挫败或缺乏心理规划的个体几乎没有改善。其次,较差的治疗结果与创伤后的疏离感或永久性改变的总体感受相关。这些结果基于对10名治疗效果良好的女性和10名治疗效果较差的女性的暴露治疗会话记录的盲评。两组患者在初始症状严重程度上相匹配,在袭击的许多方面也具有可比性。经历过精神挫败、疏离或永久性改变的患者除暴露疗法外可能还需要认知重构。

相似文献

1
Predicting response to exposure treatment in PTSD: the role of mental defeat and alienation.预测创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)暴露疗法的反应:心理挫败与疏离感的作用。
J Trauma Stress. 1998 Jul;11(3):457-71. doi: 10.1023/A:1024448511504.
2
Change in rape narratives during exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍暴露疗法中强奸叙事的变化
J Trauma Stress. 1995 Oct;8(4):675-90. doi: 10.1007/BF02102894.
3
Resolution of trauma-related guilt following treatment of PTSD in female rape victims: a result of cognitive processing therapy targeting comorbid depression?女性强奸受害者创伤后应激障碍治疗后创伤相关内疚感的缓解:针对共病抑郁的认知加工疗法的结果?
J Affect Disord. 2005 Jun;86(2-3):259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.02.013.
4
Posttraumatic stress disorder following political imprisonment: the role of mental defeat, alienation, and perceived permanent change.政治监禁后的创伤后应激障碍:精神挫败、疏离感和感知到的永久性改变的作用。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 Feb;109(1):45-55.
5
Impact of cultural differences in self on cognitive appraisals in posttraumatic stress disorder.自我文化差异对创伤后应激障碍认知评估的影响。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2009 May;37(3):249-66. doi: 10.1017/S135246580900527X. Epub 2009 May 1.
6
[Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a consequence of the interaction between an individual genetic susceptibility, a traumatogenic event and a social context].[创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)作为个体遗传易感性、创伤性事件和社会环境之间相互作用的结果]
Encephale. 2012 Oct;38(5):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
7
A controlled study of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disordered sexual assault victims.一项关于眼动脱敏与再加工疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍性侵犯受害者的对照研究。
Bull Menninger Clin. 1997 Summer;61(3):317-34.
8
Primum non nocere (first do no harm): symptom worsening and improvement in female assault victims after prolonged exposure for PTSD.首要的是不造成伤害:创伤后应激障碍女性受害者长期暴露后的症状恶化与改善情况
Depress Anxiety. 2014 May;31(5):412-9. doi: 10.1002/da.22225. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
9
Psychological treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in victims of sexual aggression.性侵犯受害者慢性创伤后应激障碍的心理治疗
Behav Modif. 1997 Oct;21(4):433-56. doi: 10.1177/01454455970214003.
10
Treatment of acute stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial.急性应激障碍的治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;65(6):659-67. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.6.659.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental Defeat Predicts Increased Suicide Risk in Chronic Pain: A 12-Month Prospective Study.精神挫败预示慢性疼痛患者自杀风险增加:一项为期12个月的前瞻性研究。
Eur J Pain. 2025 Feb;29(2):e4779. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4779.
2
Interactions between latent variables in count regression models.计数回归模型中潜变量之间的相互作用。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8932-8954. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02483-4. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Patterns of social-affective responses to trauma exposure and their relation to psychopathology.创伤暴露后的社会情感反应模式及其与精神病理学的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 5;19(3):e0289664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289664. eCollection 2024.
4
Profiles of posttraumatic stress disorder and negative world assumptions in treatment-seeking refugees.寻求治疗的难民创伤后应激障碍和负面世界假设的特征。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2314915. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2314915. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
5
The Management of Chronic Pain: Re-Centring Person-Centred Care.慢性疼痛的管理:重新聚焦以患者为中心的护理
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 7;12(22):6957. doi: 10.3390/jcm12226957.
6
Development and Validation of the Bullied Cognitions Inventory (BCI).受欺凌认知量表(BCI)的编制与验证
Cognit Ther Res. 2023;47(6):1033-1045. doi: 10.1007/s10608-023-10412-6. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
7
Investigating mental defeat in individuals with chronic pain: Protocol for a longitudinal experience sampling study.慢性疼痛患者心理挫败感研究:一项纵向经验取样研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 6;13(2):e066577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066577.
8
Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Group or Individual Cognitive Processing Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Active Duty Military.现役军人创伤后应激障碍团体或个体认知加工疗法治疗结果的预测因素
Cognit Ther Res. 2020 Feb 27;44(3):611-620. doi: 10.1007/s10608-020-10085-5.
9
Predicting Outcome in an Intensive Outpatient PTSD Treatment Program Using Daily Measures.使用每日测量法预测强化门诊创伤后应激障碍治疗项目的结果。
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 15;10(18):4152. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184152.
10
Mental Time Travel in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Current Gaps and Future Directions.创伤后应激障碍中的心理时光旅行:当前差距与未来方向
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 9;12:624707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624707. eCollection 2021.