Marful Alejandra, Paolieri Daniela, Bajo M Teresa
Department of Psychology, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas, C-5, 23071, Jaén, Spain,
Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):525-37. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0376-8.
A current debate regarding face and object naming concerns whether they are equally vulnerable to semantic interference. Although some studies have shown similar patterns of interference, others have revealed different effects for faces and objects. In Experiment 1, we compared face naming to object naming when exemplars were presented in a semantically homogeneous context (grouped by their category) or in a semantically heterogeneous context (mixed) across four cycles. The data revealed significant slowing for both face and object naming in the homogeneous context. This semantic interference was explained as being due to lexical competition from the conceptual activation of category members. When focusing on the first cycle, a facilitation effect for objects but not for faces appeared. This result permits us to explain the previously observed discrepancies between face and object naming. Experiment 2 was identical to Experiment 1, with the exception that half of the stimuli were presented as face/object names for reading. Semantic interference was present for both face and object naming, suggesting that faces and objects behave similarly during naming. Interestingly, during reading, semantic interference was observed for face names but not for object names. This pattern is consistent with previous assumptions proposing the activation of a person identity during face name reading.
当前关于面部和物体命名的争论焦点在于它们是否同样容易受到语义干扰。尽管一些研究显示出相似的干扰模式,但其他研究揭示了面部和物体的不同效应。在实验1中,我们比较了在四个循环中,当范例在语义同质的情境(按类别分组)或语义异质的情境(混合)中呈现时的面部命名和物体命名。数据显示,在同质情境中,面部和物体命名都显著变慢。这种语义干扰被解释为是由于类别成员概念激活导致的词汇竞争。当关注第一个循环时,出现了对物体而非面部的促进效应。这一结果使我们能够解释先前观察到的面部和物体命名之间的差异。实验2与实验1相同,只是一半的刺激以面部/物体名称的形式呈现用于阅读。面部和物体命名都存在语义干扰,这表明面部和物体在命名过程中的表现相似。有趣的是,在阅读过程中,面部名称存在语义干扰,而物体名称则没有。这种模式与先前提出的在面部名称阅读过程中激活个人身份的假设一致。