Suppr超能文献

对重症患者进行尸检是否能揭示临床上未被发现的重要发现?

Do autopsies of critically ill patients reveal important findings that were clinically undetected?

作者信息

Blosser S A, Zimmerman H E, Stauffer J L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, The M.S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033-0850, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;26(8):1332-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199808000-00015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if autopsies performed on patients who die in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) provide clinically important new information.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

A 16-bed medical-coronary ICU.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent autopsy during a 1-yr period.

INTERVENTIONS

Pre mortem diagnoses were determined from the medical record. Autopsy results were obtained from the final pathology report. A panel of three physicians with certification of added qualifications in critical care medicine reviewed the findings.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

These questions were asked: a) Is the primary clinical diagnosis confirmed? b) Are the clinical and pathologic causes of death the same? c) Are new active diagnoses revealed? and d) If the new findings had been known before death, would the clinical management have differed? Forty-one autopsies (31% of deaths) were done that showed: a) the same primary clinical diagnosis and post mortem diagnosis in 34 (83%) patients; b) the same clinical and pathologic cause of death in 27 (66%) patients; c) new active diagnoses in 37 (90%) patients; and d) findings that would have changed medical ICU therapy had the findings been known in 11 (27%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the primary clinical diagnosis was accurate in most cases before death, the cause of death was frequently unknown. Almost all autopsies demonstrated new diagnoses, and knowledge of these new findings would have changed medical ICU therapy in many cases. In the critical care setting, autopsies continue to provide information that could be important for education and quality patient care.

摘要

目的

确定对在医学重症监护病房(ICU)死亡的患者进行尸检是否能提供具有临床重要性的新信息。

设计

回顾性研究。

地点

一个拥有16张床位的内科-冠心病ICU。

患者

在1年期间接受尸检的患者。

干预措施

根据病历确定生前诊断。从最终病理报告中获取尸检结果。由三名具有重症医学附加资质认证的医生组成的小组对结果进行审查。

测量指标和主要结果

提出了以下问题:a)主要临床诊断是否得到证实?b)临床和病理死因是否相同?c)是否发现新的活动性诊断?d)如果在死亡前就已知这些新发现,临床管理是否会有所不同?共进行了41例尸检(占死亡病例的31%),结果显示:a)34例(83%)患者的主要临床诊断和死后诊断相同;b)27例(66%)患者的临床和病理死因相同;c)37例(90%)患者发现新的活动性诊断;d)如果这些发现已知,11例(27%)患者的治疗方案会有所改变。

结论

尽管大多数情况下生前的主要临床诊断是准确的,但死因往往不明。几乎所有尸检都发现了新的诊断,了解这些新发现会在很多情况下改变医学ICU的治疗方案。在重症监护环境中,尸检继续提供对教育和优质患者护理可能很重要的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验