Heath E M, Adams T D, Daines M M, Hunt S C
College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso 79902-0581, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Aug;98(8):869-75. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00201-6.
To compare hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) for measurement of body composition of persons who are morbidly obese.
Body composition was determined using 3 methods: hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion and BIA. Residual volume for the hydrostatic weighing calculation was determined by body plethysmography.
Subjects were 16 morbidly obese men (142.5 kg mean body weight) and 30 morbidly obese women (125.9 kg mean body weight) living in the Salt Lake County, Utah, area. Morbid obesity was defined as 40 kg or more over ideal weight.
One-way, repeated-measures analysis of variance was followed by Scheffé post hoc tests; body-fat measurement method served as the repeated variable and percentage of body fat as the dependent variable. Men and women were analyzed separately. In addition, degree of agreement between the 3 methods of determining body composition was determined. A regression equation was used to calculate body density for hydrostatic weighing without head submersion. Two new BIA regression equations were developed from the data of the 16 men and 30 women.
Values for percentage body fat from hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion (41.8% vs 41.7%, respectively) were the same for men but differed for women (52.2% vs 49.4%, respectively, P < .0001). Values for body fat percentage measured by BIA were significantly lower for men (36.1%) and women (43.1%) (for both, P < .0001) compared with values from hydrostatic weighing methods. BIA underpredicted percentage body fat by a mean of 5.7% in men and 9.1% in women compared with the traditional hydrostatic weighing method.
APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: BIA tended to underpredict the measurement of percentage body fat in male and female subjects who were morbidly obese. Hydrostatic weighing without head submersion provides an accurate, acceptable, and convenient alternative method for body composition assessment of the morbidly obese population in comparison with the traditional hydrostatic weighing method. In population screening or other settings where underwater weighing is impractical, population-specific BIA regression equations should be used because general BIA equations lead to consistent underprediction of percentage body fat compared with hydrostatic weighing.
比较头部浸没与未浸没时的水下称重法以及生物电阻抗分析(BIA)法在测量病态肥胖者身体成分方面的差异。
采用三种方法测定身体成分:头部浸没与未浸没时的水下称重法以及BIA法。水下称重计算中的残气量通过体容积描记法测定。
研究对象为居住在犹他州盐湖县地区的16名病态肥胖男性(平均体重142.5千克)和30名病态肥胖女性(平均体重125.9千克)。病态肥胖定义为超过理想体重40千克或更多。
采用单向重复测量方差分析,随后进行谢费尔事后检验;身体脂肪测量方法作为重复变量,身体脂肪百分比作为因变量。男性和女性分别进行分析。此外,还确定了三种身体成分测定方法之间的一致性程度。使用回归方程计算头部未浸没时水下称重的身体密度。根据16名男性和30名女性的数据建立了两个新的BIA回归方程。
男性头部浸没与未浸没时水下称重的身体脂肪百分比值相同(分别为41.8%和41.7%),但女性不同(分别为52.2%和49.4%,P <.0001)。与水下称重法相比,BIA法测得的男性(36.1%)和女性(43.1%)的身体脂肪百分比值显著更低(两者P均<.0001)。与传统水下称重法相比,BIA法预测的身体脂肪百分比男性平均低5.7%,女性平均低9.1%。
应用/结论:BIA法往往会低估病态肥胖男性和女性的身体脂肪百分比测量值。与传统水下称重法相比,头部未浸没时的水下称重为病态肥胖人群的身体成分评估提供了一种准确、可接受且便捷的替代方法。在人群筛查或其他无法进行水下称重的情况下,应使用针对特定人群的BIA回归方程,因为与水下称重相比,一般的BIA方程会导致身体脂肪百分比持续被低估。