Worthington C, Vincent D J, Bryant A E, Roberts D R, Vera C L, Ross D A, George M S
Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1997;69(1-4 Pt 2):197-201. doi: 10.1159/000099874.
A comparison is made between the results of standard intracarotid speech amytal testing and a new methodology, echoplanar blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD fMRI), in patients undergoing presurgical evaluation for intractable epilepsy. Of the 15 patients entered in the study, all had fMRIs while performing a verbal fluency task. Twelve of these patients also underwent standard intracarotid sodium amytal testing for speech and memory. Results of the fMRIs as compared to the intracarotid speech amytal testing are discussed, including agreement and disagreement between studies. Potential reasons for poor concordance are discussed, including complexity of the verbal fluency task, and motion and technical issues in MRI scan acquisition and data analysis.
对接受顽固性癫痫术前评估的患者,比较了标准颈内动脉注射阿米妥语言测试结果与一种新方法——回波平面血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像(BOLD fMRI)的结果。在纳入该研究的15例患者中,所有人在执行语言流畅性任务时均进行了功能磁共振成像检查。其中12例患者还接受了标准的颈内动脉注射阿米妥语言和记忆测试。讨论了功能磁共振成像结果与颈内动脉注射阿米妥语言测试结果的对比情况,包括两项研究结果的一致性和不一致性。探讨了一致性差的潜在原因,包括语言流畅性任务的复杂性,以及磁共振成像扫描采集和数据分析中的运动和技术问题。