• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者肿瘤切除质量的前瞻性多中心研究。腹腔镜结直肠手术研究组。

Prospective multicenter study of the quality of oncologic resections in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group.

作者信息

Köckerling F, Reymond M A, Schneider C, Wittekind C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Köhler L, Bärlehner E, Kuthe A, Bruch H P, Hohenberger W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Aug;41(8):963-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02237381.

DOI:10.1007/BF02237381
PMID:9715150
Abstract

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer is currently under discussion. Results of large, randomized studies will not be available for a number of years yet. This study analyses the results of such resections in consecutive patients operated on by unselected surgeons.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, multicenter study was initiated on August 1, 1995, in the German-speaking countries of Europe. One year after initiation of the study, findings are presented with respect to the quality of oncologic resections.

RESULTS

Of 500 operations, 231 (46 percent) were performed for cancer, 167 (33 percent) with a curative intent. The most common curative resections were as follows: 63 anterior rectum resections (38 percent), 51 sigmoid resections (30 percent), and 27 abdominoperineal resections (16 percent). Segmental resections were performed in 20 patients (12 percent). Intraoperative tumor spillage was reported in 2 percent. Mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 13 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 11.5-14.6) and positive lymph nodes harvested was 2.2 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 0.9-3.4). Significant differences were noted between participating centers in terms of number of lymph nodes resected (P < 0.0001). Distal and proximal resection margins were tumor-free in every case. Lateral margins were tumor free when examined. In the case of 63 curative anterior resections, the mean distal resection margin was 39 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 33-45) mm, and in 8 of these resections, it was less than 20 min. Mean blood loss was 344 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; 292-396) ml, and 21 percent of patients received blood transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

These data document that the average quality of laparoscopic colorectal procedures for cancer is satisfactory but differs among surgeons.

摘要

目的

目前正在讨论腹腔镜结直肠癌手术。大型随机研究的结果在数年内都无法获得。本研究分析了由未经挑选的外科医生为连续患者进行此类切除手术的结果。

方法

1995年8月1日在欧洲讲德语的国家启动了一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究。研究开始一年后,报告了肿瘤切除质量方面的研究结果。

结果

在500例手术中,231例(46%)是因癌症进行的手术,167例(33%)有治愈意图。最常见的根治性切除如下:63例直肠前切除术(38%),51例乙状结肠切除术(30%),27例腹会阴联合切除术(16%)。20例患者(12%)进行了节段性切除。报告术中肿瘤溢出的占2%。平均采集淋巴结数为13个(置信区间,5 - 95%;范围,11.5 - 14.6),采集到的阳性淋巴结数为2.2个(置信区间,5 - 95%;范围,0.9 - 3.4)。各参与中心在切除淋巴结数量方面存在显著差异(P < 0.0001)。每个病例的远、近端切缘均无肿瘤。检查时外侧切缘无肿瘤。在63例根治性前切除术中,平均远端切缘为39毫米(置信区间,5 - 95%;范围,33 - 45),其中8例切缘小于20毫米。平均失血量为344毫升(置信区间,5 - 95%;292 - 396),21%的患者接受了输血。

结论

这些数据表明,腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的平均质量令人满意,但不同外科医生之间存在差异。

相似文献

1
Prospective multicenter study of the quality of oncologic resections in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者肿瘤切除质量的前瞻性多中心研究。腹腔镜结直肠手术研究组。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Aug;41(8):963-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02237381.
2
Laparoscopy as a prognostic factor in curative resection for node positive colorectal cancer: results for a single-institution nonrandomized prospective trial.腹腔镜检查作为淋巴结阳性结直肠癌根治性切除的预后因素:单机构非随机前瞻性试验结果
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1130-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9152-3. Epub 2004 May 27.
3
Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period.十年间腹腔镜与开放手术切除结直肠癌的前瞻性比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 May;46(5):601-11. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6616-z.
4
Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: early postoperative results of a prospective study involving 116 patients. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group.腹腔镜经腹会阴联合切除术:一项涉及116例患者的前瞻性研究的术后早期结果。腹腔镜结直肠手术研究组
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Nov;43(11):1503-11. doi: 10.1007/BF02236728.
5
Long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: complete five-year follow-up.腹腔镜结肠癌切除术的长期生存:完整的五年随访
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Apr;45(4):491-501. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6227-8.
6
Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence to assess bowel perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal resection.吲哚菁绿增强荧光用于评估腹腔镜结直肠切除术中的肠灌注情况。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2736-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4540-z. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
7
Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma. A three-year experience.腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术。三年经验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Feb;39(2):148-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02068068.
8
Early results of a prospective multicenter study on 500 consecutive cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG).一项针对500例连续腹腔镜结直肠手术病例的前瞻性多中心研究的早期结果。腹腔镜结直肠手术研究组(LCSSG)。
Surg Endosc. 1998 Jan;12(1):37-41. doi: 10.1007/s004649900588.
9
[Prospective multicenter study of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Quality assurance during introduction of new methods].[腹腔镜结直肠手术的前瞻性多中心研究。新方法引入过程中的质量保证]
Zentralbl Chir. 2000;125 Suppl 2:164-8.
10
Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.多媒体文章。腹腔镜超低位前切除术联合结肠J形贮袋肛管吻合术。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov;51(11):1710-1. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9322-4. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 163 Patients in a Single Institution.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌:单机构163例患者的回顾性分析
Minim Invasive Surg. 2014;2014:530314. doi: 10.1155/2014/530314. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
2
Systematic review of oncological outcomes following laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision.腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术肿瘤学结局的系统评价
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May 16;6(5):209-19. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.209.
3
Does case selection and outcome following laparoscopic colorectal resection change after initial learning curve? Analysis of 235 consecutive elective laparoscopic colorectal resections.
在度过初始学习曲线后,腹腔镜结直肠切除术中的病例选择和结果会发生变化吗?对235例连续择期腹腔镜结直肠切除术的分析。
J Minim Access Surg. 2013 Jul;9(3):99-103. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.115366.
4
Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable.结肠癌的扩大淋巴结清扫术存在争议。
World J Surg. 2013 Aug;37(8):1799-807. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2071-0.
5
Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients.腹腔镜直肠癌手术:225例患者的肿瘤学结果及临床结局
Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2229-37. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0028-4. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
6
Predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Mar;12(1):27-31. doi: 10.1007/s10151-008-0394-x. Epub 2008 May 30.
7
Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome.300例腹腔镜直肠切除术的转化率及其对发病率和肿瘤学结局的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Apr;23(4):409-17. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0425-5.
8
Restorative proctectomy with colon pouch-anal anastomosis by laparoscopic transanal pull-through: an available option for low rectal cancer?经腹腔镜经肛门拖出术行直肠切除结肠袋肛管吻合术:低位直肠癌的一种可行选择?
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jan;21(1):91-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9263-5. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
9
[Long-term oncological results after laparoscopic, converted and primary open procedures for rectal carcinoma. Results of a multicenter observational study].[腹腔镜、中转及原发性开放手术治疗直肠癌后的长期肿瘤学结果。一项多中心观察性研究的结果]
Chirurg. 2006 Aug;77(8):709-17. doi: 10.1007/s00104-006-1199-y.
10
The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma.保留括约肌的腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的肿瘤学安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jul;19(7):892-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2228-x. Epub 2005 May 12.