Deibert P, Schwarz S, Olschewski M, Siegerstetter V, Blum H E, Rössle M
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Aug;43(8):1708-13. doi: 10.1023/a:1018819316633.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a single dose of a second-generation cephalosporine to prevent postinterventional infection and to identify risk factors for postinterventional infection in patients receiving implantation or revision of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Eighty-four patients (105 transjugular interventions) were randomized receiving no antibiotic treatment (46 interventions) or 2 g cefotiam (56 interventions) given at the beginning of the procedure. Patients with overt infection or those receiving antibiotic treatment in the preceding two weeks were excluded. Groups were comparable with respect to biographic and medical data. Postinterventional infection was defined as an increase in WBC count (> or =15,000/microl), fever (> or =38.5 degrees C), or a positive blood culture. Infection occurred in 17% of the patients. Patients not receiving cefotiam had a slightly higher incidence of infection (20%) than patients treated with cefotiam (14%, NS). Multivariate analysis demonstrated prognostic relevance for multiple stenting and periprocedural use of a central venous line. The clinical outcome of the patients was unaffected by cefotiam treatment. In conclusion, a single dose of intrainterventional cefotiam does not prevent postinterventional infection. This may be due to the antimicrobial spectrum and short half-time of cefotiam. Strict adherence to aseptic conditions during intervention and early removal of central venous lines may reduce the rate of post interventional infection considerably. Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefotiam does not seem to be useful since it will not influence outcome and costs.
本研究旨在评估单剂量第二代头孢菌素预防经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)植入或翻修术后感染的疗效,并确定接受该手术患者术后感染的危险因素。84例患者(105次经颈静脉介入操作)被随机分为两组,一组不接受抗生素治疗(46次介入操作),另一组在手术开始时给予2 g头孢替安(56次介入操作)。排除有明显感染或在过去两周内接受过抗生素治疗的患者。两组在人口统计学和医学数据方面具有可比性。术后感染定义为白细胞计数增加(≥15,000/微升)、发热(≥38.5℃)或血培养阳性。17%的患者发生了感染。未接受头孢替安治疗的患者感染发生率(20%)略高于接受头孢替安治疗的患者(14%,无统计学差异)。多因素分析表明,多次支架置入和围手术期使用中心静脉导管具有预后相关性。头孢替安治疗对患者的临床结局无影响。总之,介入术中单次剂量的头孢替安不能预防术后感染。这可能是由于头孢替安的抗菌谱和半衰期较短。在介入操作过程中严格遵守无菌条件并尽早拔除中心静脉导管可能会显著降低术后感染率。使用头孢替安进行抗生素预防似乎没有用处,因为它不会影响结局且会增加费用。