Kottkamp H, Hindricks G, Breithardt G
Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hospital of the Westfälische Wilhelms-University, and the Institute for Arteriosclerosis Research, Münster, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998 Aug;9(8 Suppl):S86-96.
Atrial fibrillation belongs to the group of cardiovascular diseases that most frequently predispose to arterial thromboembolic events. Within the last years, the AFASAK, BAATAF, SPAF I, SPINAF, and CAFA trials have consistently demonstrated a significant, approximately 70%, risk reduction for stroke on oral anticoagulation in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. This benefit by far outweighed the slight increase in annual major hemorrhage. Recently, additional trials (SPAF II, EAFT, SPAF III, and others) have shed further light on important questions concerning risk factors, secondary prophylaxis, the optimal intensity of anticoagulation, and the role of aspirin and other antiplatelet drugs. The main results of these studies are discussed in this review. The majority of patients with atrial fibrillation are > 65 years of age and have other clinical or echocardiographic risk factors. In these patients, adjusted-dose warfarin with target international normalized ratios (INRs) 2.0 to 3.0 is effective and safe. The risk of stroke rises with INR values < 2.0, whereas INR values > 3.0 result in an increase in intracerebral hemorrhages, especially in the very elderly. In contrast, no anticoagulation seems warranted in younger atrial fibrillation patients < 60 years of age without any clinical or echocardiographic risk factor. An overview of all randomized trials that compared aspirin with placebo and/or adjusted-dose warfarin indicates that adjusted-dose warfarin is approximately 50% more effective than aspirin for primary and secondary prevention of stroke, at least in patients with atrial fibrillation who have clinical risk factors. Therefore, oral anticoagulation clearly is the therapy of choice for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.
心房颤动属于最常引发动脉血栓栓塞事件的心血管疾病类别。在过去几年中,AFASAK、BAATAF、SPAF I、SPINAF和CAFA试验一致表明,非风湿性心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂可使中风风险显著降低约70%。这一益处远远超过了每年主要出血轻微增加的风险。最近,其他试验(SPAF II、EAFT、SPAF III等)进一步阐明了有关危险因素、二级预防、抗凝的最佳强度以及阿司匹林和其他抗血小板药物作用的重要问题。本综述讨论了这些研究的主要结果。大多数心房颤动患者年龄超过65岁,并有其他临床或超声心动图危险因素。在这些患者中,调整剂量的华法林使国际标准化比值(INR)目标值达到2.0至3.0是有效且安全的。当INR值<2.0时,中风风险上升,而INR值>3.0会导致脑出血增加,尤其是在高龄患者中。相比之下,对于年龄<60岁且无任何临床或超声心动图危险因素的年轻心房颤动患者,似乎无需进行抗凝治疗。对所有比较阿司匹林与安慰剂和/或调整剂量华法林的随机试验的概述表明,至少在有临床危险因素的心房颤动患者中,调整剂量的华法林在预防中风的一级和二级预防方面比阿司匹林有效约50%。因此,口服抗凝显然是心房颤动患者预防血栓栓塞的首选治疗方法。