Marlatt G A, Baer J S, Kivlahan D R, Dimeff L A, Larimer M E, Quigley L A, Somers J M, Williams E
University of Washington, Department of Psychology, Seattle 98195-1525, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Aug;66(4):604-15. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.66.4.604.
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of a brief intervention designed to reduce the harmful consequences of heavy drinking among high-risk college students. Students screened for risk while in their senior year of high school (188 women and 160 men) were randomly assigned to receive an individualized motivational brief intervention in their freshman year of college or to a no-treatment control condition. A normative group selected from the entire screening pool provided a natural history comparison. Follow-up assessments over a 2-year period showed significant reductions in both drinking rates and harmful consequences, favoring students receiving the intervention. Although high-risk students continued to experience more alcohol problems than the natural history comparison group over the 2-year period, most showed a decline in problems over time, suggesting a developmental maturational effect.
这项随机对照试验评估了一种简短干预措施的效果,该措施旨在减少高危大学生过度饮酒的有害后果。在高中最后一年接受风险筛查的学生(188名女性和160名男性)被随机分配,在大学一年级时接受个性化的动机性简短干预,或进入无治疗对照组。从整个筛查群体中选出的一个规范组提供了自然史对照。为期两年的随访评估显示,饮酒率和有害后果均显著降低,接受干预的学生情况更好。尽管在这两年期间,高危学生经历的酒精问题仍比自然史对照组更多,但大多数学生的问题随着时间推移有所减少,这表明存在发育成熟效应。