Suppr超能文献

不予复苏:决策者面临的伦理困境。

Do not resuscitate: an ethical dilemma for the decision-maker.

作者信息

Birtwistle J, Nielsen A

机构信息

University of Southampton, Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 1998;7(9):543-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1998.7.9.5697.

Abstract

Since its introduction in the 1960s, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been universally available to all hospital patients unless the consultant in charge has specified a 'do not resuscitate' (DNR) order. The public perception of CPR has tended to be one of overoptimism, but this is not matched by the low survival to discharge ratio of approximately 1:10. In addition, there is the risk of prolonging suffering, compared with the quick and relatively painfree alternative offered by cardiac arrest. Decisions about resuscitation pose many ethical dilemmas for those involved and should take into consideration the patient's wishes, prognosis and quality of life.

摘要

自20世纪60年代心肺复苏术(CPR)引入以来,所有住院患者均可普遍获得该急救措施,除非主管顾问下达了“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱。公众对心肺复苏术的看法往往过于乐观,但出院存活率约为1:10的低比率却与之不符。此外,与心脏骤停提供的快速且相对无痛的选择相比,存在延长痛苦的风险。关于复苏的决定给相关人员带来了许多伦理困境,并且应该考虑患者的意愿、预后和生活质量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验