Suppr超能文献

不予复苏:决策者面临的伦理困境。

Do not resuscitate: an ethical dilemma for the decision-maker.

作者信息

Birtwistle J, Nielsen A

机构信息

University of Southampton, Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 1998;7(9):543-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1998.7.9.5697.

Abstract

Since its introduction in the 1960s, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been universally available to all hospital patients unless the consultant in charge has specified a 'do not resuscitate' (DNR) order. The public perception of CPR has tended to be one of overoptimism, but this is not matched by the low survival to discharge ratio of approximately 1:10. In addition, there is the risk of prolonging suffering, compared with the quick and relatively painfree alternative offered by cardiac arrest. Decisions about resuscitation pose many ethical dilemmas for those involved and should take into consideration the patient's wishes, prognosis and quality of life.

摘要

自20世纪60年代心肺复苏术(CPR)引入以来,所有住院患者均可普遍获得该急救措施,除非主管顾问下达了“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱。公众对心肺复苏术的看法往往过于乐观,但出院存活率约为1:10的低比率却与之不符。此外,与心脏骤停提供的快速且相对无痛的选择相比,存在延长痛苦的风险。关于复苏的决定给相关人员带来了许多伦理困境,并且应该考虑患者的意愿、预后和生活质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验