Herrington J L, Mody B
Ann Surg. 1976 Jun;183(6):636-44. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197606000-00004.
The operations of Nissen, Hill, and Belsey are adequate in controlling esophaegeal reflux in the majority of patients. In a small percentage however, objective and subjective evidence of esophagitis persists in spite of repeated operations to restore lower esophageal sphincter competency. These failures are then usually treated by operative procedures of great magnitude involving organ interposition. Repeated antireflux operations directed to the gastroesophageal area may in some instances result in impairment of blood supply with an increased risk of both esophageal and gastric fistulae. In the past many observers have felt that reflux esophagitis resulted solely from the effects of acid-pepsin secretions bathing the distal esophagus. Recently experimental and clinical data have indicated the importance of duodenal contents in the etiology and perpetuation of reflux esophagitis. During a recent two year period, 6 patients with persistent reflux esophagitis uncontrolled by repeated antireflux procedures have been seen on our service. These 6 patients, underwent 12 unsuccessful antireflux operations elsewhere. Three of the 6 patients had also been subjected to vagotomy-antrectomy for a coexisting duodenal ulcer. A marked lowering of gastric acidity took place but esophageal reflux and esophagitis persisted. These three patients were treated on our service by takedown of the Billroth I anastomosis, closure of the duodenal stump and diversion of the duodenal contents into a Roux-en-Y limb. Three other patients who had undergone unsuccessful antireflux procedures alone were subjected to antral resection, Roux-en-Y diversion and transthoracid vagotomy. This simplified appraoch to the treatment of persistent esophageal reflux uncontrolled by repeated antireflux procedures has given satisfactory results. The operation should be considered when technical considerations preclude further surgical attempts to perform another effective antireflux operation. Total duodenal diversion should, however, not be considered as the primary operation for the patient suffering from reflux esophagitis. However, in circumstances discussed above this direct approach appears preferable to major resectional procedures.
尼森手术、希尔手术和贝尔西手术在大多数患者中足以控制食管反流。然而,有一小部分患者,尽管多次手术试图恢复食管下括约肌功能,但食管炎的客观和主观证据仍然存在。这些手术失败的患者随后通常需要接受涉及器官间置的大型手术治疗。针对胃食管区域反复进行抗反流手术,在某些情况下可能会导致血液供应受损,增加食管和胃瘘的风险。过去,许多观察者认为反流性食管炎完全是由胃酸 - 胃蛋白酶分泌物对食管远端的刺激所致。最近的实验和临床数据表明,十二指肠内容物在反流性食管炎的病因及持续存在方面具有重要作用。在最近两年期间,我们科室接诊了6例经反复抗反流手术仍无法控制的持续性反流性食管炎患者。这6例患者在其他地方接受了12次抗反流手术均未成功。6例患者中有3例还因并存十二指肠溃疡接受了迷走神经切断术 - 胃窦切除术。胃酸分泌显著降低,但食管反流和食管炎仍然存在。我们科室对这3例患者进行了毕罗Ⅰ式吻合口拆除、十二指肠残端闭合,并将十二指肠内容物改道至空肠袢(Roux - en - Y吻合)。另外3例仅接受抗反流手术失败的患者接受了胃窦切除术、Roux - en - Y改道和经胸迷走神经切断术。这种针对经反复抗反流手术仍无法控制的持续性食管反流的简化治疗方法取得了满意的效果。当技术因素排除了进一步进行另一次有效抗反流手术的尝试时,应考虑进行这种手术。然而,对于反流性食管炎患者,不应将完全十二指肠改道视为首选手术。不过,在上述情况下,这种直接的方法似乎比大型切除手术更可取。