Suppr超能文献

[鼻内镜鼻窦手术中导致永久性损伤的并发症——在经验丰富的外科医生中更常见?]

[Complications with permanent damage in endonasal paranasal sinus operations--more frequent in experienced surgeons?].

作者信息

Weber R, Keerl R, Hosemann W, Schauss F, Leuwer R, Draf W

机构信息

Klinik für HNO-Krankheiten, Kopf-, Hals- und Plastische Gesichtschirurgie, Kommunikationsstörungen, Klinikum Fulda.

出版信息

Laryngorhinootologie. 1998 Jul;77(7):398-401. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996997.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rate of serious complications in endonasal sinus surgery has not gone down although optical aids are widely used nowadays. Are serious complications caused more often by unexperienced or experienced surgeons using a microscope and/or endoscope?

METHODS

We defined serious complications as follows: death, persistent neurological deficits or permanent loss of vision, and injury to the internal carotid artery. Two different studies were made: the first consecutive 300 interventions of 6 sinus surgeons were evaluated. Sixteen malpractice cases were analysed regarding the experience of the surgeon.

RESULTS

In 9 out of 16 malpractice cases serious complications were attributable to experienced surgeons, five to moderately experienced surgeons, and only two to an inexperienced surgeon (although he had extensive experience in external sinus surgery). There were 6 deaths, 6 neurologic defects, 2 visual disorders, and 2 injuries to the internal carotid artery without any sequelae. In 9 cases the serious complications were related to injury of the internal carotid artery, in five cases to perforation of the skull base. Twice the orbital wall was penetrated. In 1800 procedures performed by 6 surgeons, no serious complications were encountered. There were only lesions of the periorbit (n = 33) or CSF leaks (n = 8) without any permanent damage to the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Even an experienced surgeon must always keep in mind that serious complications can occur in sinus surgery. One must constantly be alert to the possibility of anatomical variants or specific pathologic findings.

摘要

背景

尽管如今光学辅助设备已被广泛应用,但鼻内鼻窦手术的严重并发症发生率并未下降。严重并发症更常是由经验不足还是经验丰富的外科医生使用显微镜和/或内窥镜导致的呢?

方法

我们将严重并发症定义如下:死亡、持续性神经功能缺损或永久性视力丧失以及颈内动脉损伤。进行了两项不同的研究:对6位鼻窦外科医生连续进行的300例手术进行评估。分析了16起医疗事故案例中外科医生的经验情况。

结果

在16起医疗事故案例中,9例严重并发症归因于经验丰富的外科医生,5例归因于经验中等的外科医生,只有2例归因于经验不足的外科医生(尽管他在鼻窦外手术方面有丰富经验)。有6例死亡、6例神经功能缺损、2例视觉障碍以及2例颈内动脉损伤且无任何后遗症。9例严重并发症与颈内动脉损伤有关,5例与颅底穿孔有关。有两次眶壁被穿透。6位外科医生进行的1800例手术中未出现严重并发症。仅出现眶周病变(n = 33)或脑脊液漏(n = 8),对患者无任何永久性损害。

结论

即使是经验丰富的外科医生也必须始终牢记鼻窦手术可能会出现严重并发症。必须时刻警惕解剖变异或特定病理发现的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验