• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异常检测:眼动模式。

Anomaly detection: eye movement patterns.

作者信息

Ni W, Fodor J D, Crain S, Shankweiler D

机构信息

Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 1998 Sep;27(5):515-39. doi: 10.1023/a:1024996828734.

DOI:10.1023/a:1024996828734
PMID:9750312
Abstract

The symptom of a garden path in sentence processing is an important anomaly in the input string. This anomaly signals to the parser that an error has occurred, and provides cues for how to repair it. Anomaly detection is thus an important aspect of sentence processing. In the present study, we investigated how the parser responds to unambiguous sentences that contain syntactic anomalies and pragmatic anomalies, examining records of eye movement during reading. While sensitivity to the two kinds of anomaly was very rapid and essentially simultaneous, qualitative differences existed in the patterns of first-pass reading times and eye regressions. The results are compatible with the proposal that syntactic information and pragmatic information are used differently in garden-path recovery.

摘要

句子处理中“花园路径”现象的症状是输入字符串中的一个重要异常。这种异常向解析器发出错误信号,并为如何修复错误提供线索。因此,异常检测是句子处理的一个重要方面。在本研究中,我们通过检查阅读过程中的眼动记录,研究了解析器如何对包含句法异常和语用异常的明确句子做出反应。虽然对这两种异常的敏感度都非常快且基本同步,但首次阅读时间和眼跳回视模式存在质的差异。这些结果与句法信息和语用信息在“花园路径”恢复中使用方式不同的观点一致。

相似文献

1
Anomaly detection: eye movement patterns.异常检测:眼动模式。
J Psycholinguist Res. 1998 Sep;27(5):515-39. doi: 10.1023/a:1024996828734.
2
Readers' eye movements distinguish anomalies of form and content.读者的眼球运动能区分形式和内容上的异常。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2002 Jan;31(1):25-44. doi: 10.1023/a:1014324220455.
3
Tasks and timing in the perception of linguistic anomaly.语言异常感知中的任务与时机
J Psycholinguist Res. 1996 Jan;25(1):25-57. doi: 10.1007/BF01708419.
4
Overt reanalysis strategies and eye movements during the reading of mild garden path sentences.阅读轻度花园小径句子时的显性重新分析策略与眼动
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jun;30(4):551-61. doi: 10.3758/bf03194956.
5
Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.儿童的阅读“足够好”吗?儿童阅读句法歧义句时在线加工与理解之间的联系。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(5):855-79. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1011176. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
6
Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery.母语和非母语句子理解中重新分析与语义持续性研究
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(5):907-25. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.984231. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
7
[Eye movement parameters in reading the sentences with syntactic ambiguity in Russian language].[阅读俄语中带有句法歧义句子时的眼动参数]
Fiziol Cheloveka. 2014 Sep-Oct;40(5):57-68.
8
When readers fail to form a coherent representation of garden-path sentences.当读者无法形成花园小径句子的连贯表示时。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Jan;75(1):169-190. doi: 10.1177/17470218211037152. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
9
Single-Stage Prediction Models Do Not Explain the Magnitude of Syntactic Disambiguation Difficulty.单阶段预测模型无法解释句法消歧难度的大小。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Jun;45(6):e12988. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12988.
10
Eye movement alterations during reading in patients with early Alzheimer disease.早期阿尔茨海默病患者阅读过程中的眼球运动改变。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Dec 30;54(13):8345-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12877.

引用本文的文献

1
The Implicit and Explicit Prosody of the Focus Operator (Because) in Chinese Complex Sentences.汉语复合句中焦点算子“因为”的隐性与显性韵律
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 2;15(6):766. doi: 10.3390/bs15060766.
2
Early parafoveal semantic integration in natural reading.自然阅读中早期的视副区语义整合。
Elife. 2024 Jul 5;12:RP91327. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91327.
3
Chunk boundaries disrupt dependency processing in an AG: Reconciling incremental processing and discrete sampling.AG 中的词块边界会破坏依存关系处理:协调增量处理和离散采样。

本文引用的文献

1
The processing nature of the n400: evidence from masked priming.N400 的加工性质:来自掩蔽启动的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Winter;5(1):34-44. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.34.
2
Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials.基于句法的句子加工分类:来自事件相关脑电位的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Spring;3(2):151-65. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.151.
3
Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: first-pass and second-pass parsing processes.大脑反应揭示的句法剖析:首次剖析和二次剖析过程
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 18;19(6):e0305333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305333. eCollection 2024.
4
Linguistic Illusions Guide Eye Movement: Evidence From Doubling.语言错觉引导眼球运动:来自加倍的证据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Dec;52(6):2811-2833. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-10023-y. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
5
Not all grammar errors are equally noticed: error detection of naturally occurring errors and implications for eye-tracking models of everyday texts.并非所有语法错误都会被同等程度地注意到:自然出现的错误的错误检测以及对日常文本眼动追踪模型的启示。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 13;14:1124227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124227. eCollection 2023.
6
Code-switching costs from Chinese-English relative clauses processing.汉英关系从句加工中的语码转换代价。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 25;14:1144530. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144530. eCollection 2023.
7
Don't overthink it: The paradoxical nature of expertise for the detection of errors in conceptual business process models.别想得太复杂:概念性业务流程模型中错误检测专业知识的矛盾本质。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 24;16:982764. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.982764. eCollection 2022.
8
Domain-general conflict monitoring predicts neural and behavioral indices of linguistic error processing during reading comprehension.领域泛化冲突监测可预测阅读理解过程中语言错误处理的神经和行为指标。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jul;151(7):1502-1519. doi: 10.1037/xge0001130. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
9
Individual Differences in Political Ideology and Disgust Sensitivity Affect Real-Time Spoken Language Comprehension.政治意识形态和厌恶敏感性的个体差异影响实时口语理解。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 11;12:699071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.699071. eCollection 2021.
10
Processing cataphors: Active antecedent search is persistent.加工隐语:显性先行语搜索是持续的。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct;49(7):1370-1386. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01176-z. Epub 2021 May 11.
J Psycholinguist Res. 1996 Jan;25(1):157-76. doi: 10.1007/BF01708424.
4
Tasks and timing in the perception of linguistic anomaly.语言异常感知中的任务与时机
J Psycholinguist Res. 1996 Jan;25(1):25-57. doi: 10.1007/BF01708419.
5
Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials.处理在句法和语义维度上变化的关系从句:一项基于事件相关电位的分析。
Mem Cognit. 1995 Jul;23(4):477-94. doi: 10.3758/bf03197249.
6
Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs.句子处理与动词的心理表征
Cognition. 1987 Dec;27(3):219-46. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(87)80010-0.