• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性颈动脉狭窄:无症状性颈动脉粥样硬化研究结果

Recurrent carotid stenosis : results of the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study.

作者信息

Moore W S, Kempczinski R F, Nelson J J, Toole J F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, California.

出版信息

Stroke. 1998 Oct;29(10):2018-25. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.10.2018.

DOI:10.1161/01.str.29.10.2018
PMID:9756575
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We sought to determine the incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis in patients in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) who had undergone carotid endarterectomy and were prospectively followed with Doppler ultrasound for up to 5 years.

METHODS

The ACAS database was interrogated to determine the rate of recurrent carotid stenosis (>/=60%) based up angiogram-validated Doppler data, with a 90% and a 95% positive predictive value, as well as information concerning the technologists' interpretation of percent stenosis. These 3 parameters are reported for each of 3 time intervals: within 3 months of operation (residual disease), between 3 and 18 months (early restenoses), and between 18 and 60 months (late restenosis).

RESULTS

Of the 825 patients randomized to the surgical arm of the study, 720 actually underwent carotid endarterectomy, and 645 had complete ultrasound data. The aggregate incidence of residual and recurrent carotid stenosis for all time intervals ranged from 12.7% to 20.4%, depending on the positive predictive value confidence level desired. Residual disease occurred in 4.1% to 6.5%; true, early restenosis was found in 7.6% to 11.4%; and late restenosis occurred in 1.9% to 4.9%. None of the traditional risk factors showed a statistically significant effect on recurrent stenosis. The use of patch angioplasty closure reduced overall risk of restenosis from 21.2% to 7.1%, from 16.7% to 4.6%, and from 27.4% to 8.2%, depending on the PPV confidence level desired (P<0.001). Of the 136 patients judged to have recurrent stenosis, only 8 (5.9%) underwent reoperation (only 1 for symptoms). There was no correlation between late stroke and recurrent stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid endarterectomy is a durable procedure with a low rate of true restenosis, particularly when patch angioplasty is used to close the arteriotomy.

摘要

背景与目的

我们试图确定无症状性颈动脉粥样硬化研究(ACAS)中接受颈动脉内膜切除术并接受多普勒超声前瞻性随访长达5年的患者复发性颈动脉狭窄的发生率。

方法

查询ACAS数据库,根据血管造影验证的多普勒数据确定复发性颈动脉狭窄(≥60%)的发生率,同时给出90%和95%的阳性预测值,以及技术人员对狭窄百分比的解读信息。这三个参数按三个时间间隔分别报告:术后3个月内(残余疾病)、3至18个月(早期再狭窄)和18至60个月(晚期再狭窄)。

结果

在随机分配到该研究手术组的825例患者中,720例实际接受了颈动脉内膜切除术,645例有完整的超声数据。所有时间间隔内残余和复发性颈动脉狭窄的总发生率在12.7%至20.4%之间,具体取决于所需的阳性预测值置信水平。残余疾病发生率为4.1%至6.5%;真正的早期再狭窄发生率为7.6%至11.4%;晚期再狭窄发生率为1.9%至4.9%。没有传统危险因素对复发性狭窄有统计学意义的影响。使用补片血管成形术闭合可将再狭窄的总体风险从21.2%降至7.1%,从16.7%降至4.6%,从27.4%降至8.2%,具体取决于所需的PPV置信水平(P<0.001)。在136例被判定为复发性狭窄的患者中,只有8例(5.9%)接受了再次手术(仅1例有症状)。晚期卒中与复发性狭窄之间无相关性。

结论

颈动脉内膜切除术是一种持久的手术,真正的再狭窄率较低,尤其是在使用补片血管成形术闭合动脉切开处时。

相似文献

1
Recurrent carotid stenosis : results of the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study.复发性颈动脉狭窄:无症状性颈动脉粥样硬化研究结果
Stroke. 1998 Oct;29(10):2018-25. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.10.2018.
2
Restenosis after carotid angioplasty, stenting, or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS).颈动脉和椎动脉腔内血管成形术研究(CAVATAS)中颈动脉血管成形术、支架置入术或动脉内膜切除术后的再狭窄。
Stroke. 2005 Feb;36(2):281-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000152333.75932.fe. Epub 2005 Jan 13.
3
Long-term follow-up for recurrent stenosis: a prospective randomized study of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch angioplasty versus primary closure after carotid endarterectomy.复发性狭窄的长期随访:一项关于颈动脉内膜切除术后膨体聚四氟乙烯补片血管成形术与一期缝合的前瞻性随机研究。
J Vasc Surg. 1994 Feb;19(2):198-203; discussion 204-5. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70095-8.
4
Safety and durability of redo carotid endarterectomy for recurrent carotid artery stenosis.复发性颈动脉狭窄再次行颈动脉内膜切除术的安全性和耐久性
Am J Surg. 1994 Aug;168(2):175-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(94)80062-6.
5
Prospective randomized trial of bilateral carotid endarterectomies: primary closure versus patching.双侧颈动脉内膜切除术的前瞻性随机试验:一期缝合与补片修补对比
Stroke. 1999 Jun;30(6):1185-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.6.1185.
6
Results of carotid endarterectomy with pericardial patch angioplasty: rate and predictors of restenosis.采用心包补片血管成形术的颈动脉内膜切除术结果:再狭窄率及预测因素
Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Nov;21(6):767-71. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.07.005.
7
The role of patch angioplasty in prevention of early recurrent carotid stenosis.血管腔内补片成形术在预防早期复发性颈动脉狭窄中的作用。
Ann Vasc Surg. 1999 Mar;13(2):169-73. doi: 10.1007/s100169900236.
8
Recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后复发性狭窄
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979 Sep;149(3):360-4.
9
Routine surveillance after carotid endarterectomy: does it affect clinical management?颈动脉内膜切除术后的常规监测:它会影响临床管理吗?
J Vasc Surg. 1993 May;17(5):819-30; discussion 830-1.
10
Single center experience with modified eversion carotid endarterectomy.改良外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术的单中心经验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;25(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.11.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Symptomatic Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenting in Octogenarians: A Single-Center Retrospective Study on Restenosis, Risk Factors, and Complications.八旬老人症状性颅外颈动脉支架置入术的结局:一项关于再狭窄、危险因素和并发症的单中心回顾性研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 17;61(3):519. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030519.
2
Long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis: A single-center 14-year retrospective analysis.颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术的长期预后:一项单中心14年回顾性分析。
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2023 Jun;25(2):160-174. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2023.E2022.07.007. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
3
Loss of follow-up after carotid revascularization is associated with worse long-term stroke and death.
颈动脉血运重建术后失访与长期卒中及死亡风险增加相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Feb;77(2):548-554.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.09.023. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Ipsilateral carotid bypass outcomes in hostile neck anatomy.同侧颈动脉旁路手术在复杂颈部解剖中的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Dec;74(6):1929-1936. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.036. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
5
The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review.颈动脉再狭窄的管理:一项全面综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1272. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-963.
6
Diagnostic vascular ultrasonography with the help of color Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.诊断血管超声检查(彩色多谱勒和超声造影)。
Ultrasonography. 2016 Oct;35(4):289-301. doi: 10.14366/usg.16027. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
7
Effect of patching on reducing restenosis in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.在颈动脉血管重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验中,封堵对减少再狭窄的影响。
Stroke. 2015 Mar;46(3):757-61. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007634. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
8
Management of extracranial carotid artery disease.颅外颈动脉疾病的管理
Cardiol Clin. 2015 Feb;33(1):1-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2014.09.001.
9
Factors affecting long-term restenosis after carotid stenting for carotid atherosclerotic disease.影响颈动脉粥样硬化性疾病颈动脉支架置入术后长期再狭窄的因素。
Neuroradiology. 2012 Dec;54(12):1347-53. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1031-y. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
10
[Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery].[颈动脉的超声造影成像]
Radiologe. 2011 Jun;51(6):483-9. doi: 10.1007/s00117-010-2102-x.