Suppr超能文献

呼吸装置对职业性哮喘农民的保护作用。

Protective effect of respiratory devices in farmers with occupational asthma.

作者信息

Müller-Wening D, Neuhauss M

机构信息

Zusamklinik der LVA Schwaben, Zusmarshausen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1998 Sep;12(3):569-72. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.12030569.

Abstract

To the authors' knowledge there have been no previous reports on the protection afforded by powered filtering respirators in farmers with occupational asthma attributed to the inhalation of organic dust. In order to investigate this question, 26 farmers with occupational asthma were challenged with an exposure to work-related dusts for up to 60 min. This resulted in highly significant increases in airway resistance (Raw), thoracic gas volume (TGV) and specific airway resistance (sRaw) compared to baseline values. After a mean period of 21 weeks the farmers were subjected to a second challenge, this time wearing a protective respiratory device (RD) with a P2 filter. Significant increases in Raw, TGV and sRaw were again observed, but on average these were 50-80% smaller than the increases seen when RDs were not worn. These differences were found to be statistically significant. This shows that the use of a respiratory device in farmers suffering from occupational asthma reduces the development of bronchial obstruction but does not prevent it. The use of this kind of respiratory device cannot substitute for the proper management of asthma since the devices do not offer complete protection.

摘要

据作者所知,此前尚无关于动力过滤式呼吸器对因吸入有机粉尘而患职业性哮喘的农民提供保护作用的报道。为了研究这个问题,对26名职业性哮喘农民进行了与工作相关粉尘长达60分钟的暴露激发试验。与基线值相比,这导致气道阻力(Raw)、胸腔气体容积(TGV)和比气道阻力(sRaw)显著增加。平均21周后,农民再次接受激发试验,这次佩戴带有P2过滤器的防护呼吸装置(RD)。再次观察到Raw、TGV和sRaw显著增加,但平均而言,这些增加比不佩戴RD时小50 - 80%。发现这些差异具有统计学意义。这表明,患有职业性哮喘的农民使用呼吸装置可减少支气管阻塞的发生,但不能预防。由于该装置不能提供完全保护,因此使用这种呼吸装置不能替代哮喘的适当管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验