Meyerowitz C, Watson G E
Eastman Department of Dentistry, University of Rochester, N.Y. 14642, USA.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 Sep;129(9):1252-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0422.
This study compared the anticaries effectiveness of an intraoral fluoride-releasing system, or IFRS, with a standard regimen of daily application of a 1.1 percent neutral sodium fluoride gel in custom trays. Caries protection in subjects in the IFRS group was comparable to that in subjects in the 1.1 percent neutral sodium fluoride group. The subjects all had head or neck cancer and had received radiation therapy, but no more recently than three months before taking part in the study. Overall, IFRS devices were well-tolerated and patient satisfaction was high. The IFRS appears to offer several advantages over the daily application of fluoride gels in custom trays.
本研究比较了口腔内氟释放系统(IFRS)与定制托盘每日应用1.1%中性氟化钠凝胶的标准方案的防龋效果。IFRS组受试者的龋齿保护效果与1.1%中性氟化钠组受试者相当。所有受试者均患有头颈癌并接受过放射治疗,但距离参加本研究的时间不超过三个月。总体而言,IFRS装置耐受性良好,患者满意度较高。与在定制托盘中每日应用氟凝胶相比,IFRS似乎具有若干优势。