• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与单采献血相关的即刻不良反应发生率。

Frequency of immediate adverse effects associated with apheresis donation.

作者信息

McLeod B C, Price T H, Owen H, Ciavarella D, Sniecinski I, Randels M J, Smith J W

机构信息

Blood Center, Rush Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1998 Oct;38(10):938-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.381098440858.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.381098440858.x
PMID:9767744
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Apheresis donation is considered safe, but the incidence of adverse effects has not been determined in a large multicenter series of donations with modern instruments.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The Hemapheresis Committee of the American Association of Blood Banks devised a uniform questionnaire that asked about 32 specific adverse effects. Transient paresthesia and mild vasovagal events were excluded. A survey was conducted in 1995; 17 centers returned 19,611 responses concerning 250 to 2,000 consecutive apheresis donations per center.

RESULTS

Six hundred adverse effects were reported in 428 donations (2.18% of donations). Pain or hematoma at a venipuncture site was the most common response (1.15% of donations); only 203 donations had other (nonvenipuncture) adverse effects (1.04%). Total and nonvenipuncture rates were, respectively, 4.84 and 2.92 percent for 2,295 first donations and 1.78 and 0.77 percent for 17,303 repeat donations (p < 0.001). Rates of nonvenipuncture symptoms in first and repeat donations were, respectively, citrate-induced nausea and/or vomiting, 0.87 and 0.27 percent; tetany, 0.09 and 0.04 percent; pallor and/or diaphoresis, 1.87 and 0.32 percent; vasovagal nausea and/or vomiting, 0.87 and 0.13 percent; syncope and/or seizure, 0.39 and 0.04 percent; and chills and/or rigors, 0.31 and 0.01 percent. The overall rate of donor unconsciousness was 0.08 percent. Hemolysis was reported twice. Clotting or leakage occurred in 0.08 percent of donations, and inability to return blood occurred in 0.16 percent. No life-threatening adverse effects were reported. Procedure-specific nonvenipuncture rates were 1.05 percent of 17,584 platelet donations, 0.67 percent of 594 white cell donations, and 0.37 percent of 1,354 plasma donations. Center-specific rates varied from 0.32 to 6.81 percent of donations for total adverse effects and from 0.11 to 2.92 percent of donations for nonvenipuncture events.

CONCLUSION

Apheresis donation is a safe undertaking, suitable for voluntary blood donors, with a very low risk of serious adverse effects. The risk of unconsciousness is lower than that found in many studies of whole-blood donation.

摘要

背景

单采献血被认为是安全的,但在使用现代仪器进行的大量多中心系列献血中,不良反应的发生率尚未确定。

研究设计与方法

美国血库协会血液单采委员会设计了一份统一问卷,询问32种特定的不良反应。排除短暂性感觉异常和轻度血管迷走神经事件。1995年进行了一项调查;17个中心返回了19611份回复,涉及每个中心250至2000次连续单采献血。

结果

在428次献血中报告了600例不良反应(占献血的2.18%)。静脉穿刺部位疼痛或血肿是最常见的反应(占献血的1.15%);只有203次献血有其他(非静脉穿刺)不良反应(占1.04%)。2295次首次献血的总发生率和非静脉穿刺发生率分别为4.84%和2.92%,17303次重复献血的发生率分别为1.78%和0.77%(p<0.001)。首次和重复献血中非静脉穿刺症状的发生率分别为:枸橼酸盐诱导的恶心和/或呕吐,0.87%和0.27%;手足搐搦,0.09%和0.04%;面色苍白和/或出汗,1.87%和0.32%;血管迷走性恶心和/或呕吐,0.87%和0.13%;晕厥和/或癫痫发作,0.39%和0.04%;寒战和/或发抖,0.31%和0.01%。献血者意识丧失的总体发生率为0.08%。报告了2次溶血。0.08%的献血发生凝血或渗漏,0.16%的献血出现回血困难。未报告危及生命的不良反应。特定程序的非静脉穿刺发生率在17584次血小板献血中为1.05%,在594次白细胞献血中为0.67%,在1354次血浆献血中为0.37%。各中心的总不良反应发生率从0.32%至6.81%不等,非静脉穿刺事件的发生率从0.11%至2.92%不等。

结论

单采献血是一项安全的活动,适合自愿献血者,严重不良反应的风险非常低。意识丧失的风险低于许多全血献血研究中的发现。

相似文献

1
Frequency of immediate adverse effects associated with apheresis donation.与单采献血相关的即刻不良反应发生率。
Transfusion. 1998 Oct;38(10):938-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.381098440858.x.
2
Frequency of immediate adverse effects associated with therapeutic apheresis.治疗性血液成分单采相关即刻不良反应的发生率
Transfusion. 1999 Mar;39(3):282-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39399219285.x.
3
Adverse reactions in blood and apheresis donors: experience from two Italian transfusion centres.血液及单采献血者的不良反应:来自两个意大利输血中心的经验
Blood Transfus. 2009 Jan;7(1):35-8. doi: 10.2450/2008.0018-08.
4
Blood donors--Serious adverse reactions (SAR) 2010-2014 EFS Châteauroux, France.献血者——2010 - 2014年严重不良反应(SAR),法国沙托鲁埃夫斯血液中心
Transfus Clin Biol. 2015 Jun;22(2):62-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 18.
5
Moderate and severe adverse events associated with apheresis donations: incidences and risk factors.与单采术相关的中度和重度不良事件:发生率和危险因素。
Transfusion. 2010 Feb;50(2):478-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02443.x. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
6
Complications of blood donation reported to haemovigilance systems: analysis of eleven years of international surveillance.向血液警戒系统报告的献血并发症:十一年国际监测分析
Vox Sang. 2021 Jul;116(6):628-636. doi: 10.1111/vox.13048. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
7
Clinical Indications and Adverse Reactions of Platelet Apheresis.血小板单采术的临床适应证及不良反应
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Jun;25(6):403-6.
8
Adverse events in platelet apheresis donors: A multivariate analysis in a hospital-based program.血小板单采献血者的不良事件:一项基于医院项目的多变量分析
Vox Sang. 1999;77(1):24-32. doi: 10.1159/000031070.
9
The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006.美国红十字会献血者血液监测项目:2006年报告的献血并发症
Transfusion. 2008 Sep;48(9):1809-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01811.x. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
10
Offering new and returned donors the option to give plasma: implications for donor retention and donor adverse events.为新老献血者提供捐献血浆的选择:对献血者保留率和献血者不良事件的影响。
Vox Sang. 2021 Mar;116(3):273-280. doi: 10.1111/vox.12977. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequent apheresis donation is not associated with adverse bone health in donors aged 45 years and over-Results from a cohort study in Australia.频繁单采献血与45岁及以上献血者的骨骼健康不良无关——澳大利亚一项队列研究的结果
Transfusion. 2025 Mar;65(3):514-523. doi: 10.1111/trf.18146. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
2
Safety of Plasmapheresis in Donors with Low IgG Levels: Results of a Prospective, Controlled Multicentre Study.低IgG水平献血者血浆置换的安全性:一项前瞻性、对照多中心研究的结果
Transfus Med Hemother. 2022 Apr 14;49(5):271-279. doi: 10.1159/000522528. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Adverse events related to central venous catheters (CVC) and the influence of CVC characteristics on peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell collection in children.
与中心静脉导管(CVC)相关的不良事件以及CVC特性对儿童外周血造血祖细胞采集的影响。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Apr 21;11:1131905. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1131905. eCollection 2023.
4
Analysis of influencing factors of serum total protein and serum calcium content in plasma donors.分析献血者血清总蛋白和血钙含量的影响因素。
PeerJ. 2022 Dec 9;10:e14474. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14474. eCollection 2022.
5
Feasibility, safety, and tolerability of two modalities of plasma exchange with albumin replacement to treat elderly patients with Alzheimer's disease in the AMBAR study.AMBAR 研究中两种含白蛋白置换的血浆置换方式治疗老年阿尔茨海默病患者的可行性、安全性和耐受性。
J Clin Apher. 2023 Feb;38(1):45-54. doi: 10.1002/jca.22026. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
6
Plasmavigilance-Adverse events among US Source plasma donors.血浆警戒-美国供血浆者中的不良事件。
Transfusion. 2021 Oct;61(10):2941-2957. doi: 10.1111/trf.16612. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
7
Plateletpheresis in the Era of Automation: Optimizing Donor Safety and Product Quality Using Modern Apheresis Instruments.自动化时代的血小板单采术:使用现代血液成分单采仪器优化供者安全与产品质量
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2021 Jan;37(1):134-139. doi: 10.1007/s12288-020-01337-1. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
8
Prevalence and predictors of adverse reactions in plateletpheresis donors with the perspective of donor safety in a tertiary care hospital of Northern India.从印度北部一家三级护理医院的献血者安全角度看单采血小板献血者不良反应的发生率及预测因素
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2020 Jan-Jun;14(1):44-48. doi: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_28_20. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
9
Analysis of Donor Safety in High Yield Plateletpheresis Procedures: An Experience from Tertiary Care Hospital in South India.高产血小板单采程序中供体安全性分析:来自印度南部三级护理医院的经验。
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2020 Jul;36(3):542-549. doi: 10.1007/s12288-020-01266-z. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
10
Haemostatic parameters, platelet activation markers, and platelet indices among regular plateletpheresis donors.定期血小板单采捐献者的止血参数、血小板活化标志物和血小板指数
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2017 Dec 1;13(2):180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.10.006. eCollection 2018 Apr.