van Beeck E F, Looman C W, Mackenbach J P
Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Public Health Rep. 1998 Sep-Oct;113(5):427-39.
To detect and explain changing trends in incidence, case fatality rates, and mortality for unintentional injuries in the Netherlands for the years 1950 through 1995.
Using national registry data, the authors analyzed trends in traffic injuries, occupational injuries, and home and leisure injuries.
Between 1950 and 1970, mortality from unintentional injuries rose, reflecting an increasing incidence of injuries. This was followed by a sharp decline in mortality due to a decreasing incidence combined with a rapidly falling case fatality rate. Starting in the second half of the 1980s, the decline in mortality leveled off as the incidence of several injury subclasses once again rose. The observed trends reflect several background factors, including economic fluctuations (influencing exposure), preventive measures (reducing injury risk and injury severity), and improvements in trauma care (lowering the severity-adjusted case fatality rate).
Injury mortality can be reduced through measures that lower injury risk, injury severity, or severity-adjusted case fatality rates. Beginning in the mid-1980s, such compensatory mechanisms have fallen short in the Netherlands. New policies are needed despite the impressive reductions in mortality already reached.
检测并阐释1950年至1995年荷兰非故意伤害的发病率、病死率和死亡率的变化趋势。
作者利用国家登记数据,分析了交通伤、职业伤以及家庭和休闲伤的趋势。
1950年至1970年间,非故意伤害的死亡率上升,反映出伤害发病率的增加。随后,由于发病率下降以及病死率迅速下降,死亡率急剧下降。从20世纪80年代后半期开始,随着几个伤害子类的发病率再次上升,死亡率的下降趋于平稳。观察到的趋势反映了几个背景因素,包括经济波动(影响暴露)、预防措施(降低伤害风险和伤害严重程度)以及创伤护理的改善(降低严重程度调整后的病死率)。
可以通过降低伤害风险、伤害严重程度或严重程度调整后的病死率的措施来降低伤害死亡率。从20世纪80年代中期开始,荷兰的这种补偿机制已经不足。尽管已经实现了令人瞩目的死亡率降低,但仍需要新的政策。