Wellens H J, Lau C P, Lüderitz B, Akhtar M, Waldo A L, Camm A J, Timmermans C, Tse H F, Jung W, Jordaens L, Ayers G
Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Circulation. 1998 Oct 20;98(16):1651-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.16.1651.
During atrial fibrillation, electrophysiological changes occur in atrial tissue that favor the maintenance of the arrhythmia and facilitate recurrence after conversion to sinus rhythm. An implantable defibrillator connected to right atrial and coronary sinus defibrillation leads allows prompt restoration of sinus rhythm by a low-energy shock. The safety and efficacy of this system, called the Atrioverter, were evaluated in a prospective, multicenter study.
The study included 51 patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation who had not responded to antiarrhythmic drugs, were in New York Heart Association Heart failure class I or II, and were at low risk for ventricular arrhythmias. The atrial defibrillation threshold had to be </=240 V during preimplant testing. Atrial fibrillation detection, R-wave shock synchronization, and defibrillation threshold were tested at implantation and during follow-up. Shock termination of spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation was performed under physician observation. Results are given after a minimum of 3 months of follow-up. During a follow-up of 72 to 613 days (mean, 259+/-138 days), 96% of 227 spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation in 41 patients were successfully converted to sinus rhythm by the Atrioverter. In 27% of episodes, several shocks were required because of early recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Shocks did not induce ventricular arrhythmias. Most patients received antiarrhythmic medication during follow-up. In 4 patients, the Atrioverter was removed: in 1 because of infection, in 1 because of cardiac tamponade, and in 1 because of frequent episodes of atrial fibrillation requiring His bundle ablation.
With the Atrioverter, prompt and safe restoration of sinus rhythm is possible in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation.
在心房颤动期间,心房组织会发生电生理变化,这些变化有利于心律失常的维持,并促使心律转复为窦性心律后复发。连接右心房和冠状静脉窦除颤导线的植入式除颤器可通过低能量电击迅速恢复窦性心律。在一项前瞻性、多中心研究中对这种称为心房转复器的系统的安全性和有效性进行了评估。
该研究纳入了51例复发性心房颤动患者,这些患者对抗心律失常药物无反应,纽约心脏协会心力衰竭分级为I级或II级,且室性心律失常风险较低。植入前测试期间心房除颤阈值必须≤240V。在植入时和随访期间对心房颤动检测、R波电击同步性和除颤阈值进行测试。在医生观察下进行心房颤动自发发作的电击终止。在至少3个月的随访后给出结果。在72至613天(平均259±138天)的随访期间,41例患者的227次心房颤动自发发作中有96%通过心房转复器成功转复为窦性心律。在27%的发作中,由于心房颤动早期复发需要多次电击。电击未诱发室性心律失常。大多数患者在随访期间接受了抗心律失常药物治疗。4例患者移除了心房转复器:1例因感染,1例因心脏压塞,1例因频繁发作的心房颤动需要进行希氏束消融。
使用心房转复器,复发性心房颤动患者有可能迅速且安全地恢复窦性心律。