Leder S B
Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06504, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Oct;79(10):1264-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90273-8.
To determine whether serial fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) can be used successfully and efficiently in deciding to change a patient's feeding status from nonoral (NPO) to oral (PO) with no adverse health outcome.
A prospective, consecutive, cohort study.
Inpatient population of a tertiary-care university teaching hospital.
Thirty-two adults were recruited from a cohort of 400 consecutive subjects who participated in a previous dysphagia study.
Serial FEES was performed 3 to 6 times in each subject to detect objectively pharyngeal phase dysphagia, aspiration, and aspiration risk and to provide information for recommendations regarding oral feeding status and therapeutic intervention. The number of FEES was based on the subject's medical status, evidence of dysphagia, and clinical judgement.
Identification of pharyngeal phase dysphagia, aspiration, and aspiration risk, and recommendations for initial feeding status, when to resume oral feeding, and what bolus consistencies to use for optimal swallowing success.
In all subjects, serial FEES detected pharyngeal phase dysphagia, aspiration, and aspiration risk and enabled determination of initial feeding status (NPO or PO), when to resume successful oral feeding, and what bolus consistencies to use for optimal swallowing success. Specifically, 15 of 32 (47%) subjects received FEES 3 to 5 times within only 6 to 22 days. Timely serial FEES allowed 22 of 32 (69%) subjects to resume an oral diet as early and safely as possible.
No subject who resumed an oral diet based on results of FEES developed an aspiration pneumonia. Serial FEES, therefore, enabled feeding status to be successful and efficiently changed from NPO to PO with no adverse health outcome. FEES was an efficient procedure with regard to appointment scheduling, transportation, patient issues, and personnel requirements.
确定连续的纤维光学吞咽内镜评估(FEES)能否成功且高效地用于决定将患者的进食状态从非经口进食(NPO)改为经口进食(PO),且不产生不良健康后果。
一项前瞻性、连续性队列研究。
一所三级大学教学医院的住院患者群体。
从参与先前吞咽困难研究的400名连续受试者队列中招募了32名成年人。
对每名受试者进行3至6次连续的FEES,以客观检测咽期吞咽困难、误吸及误吸风险,并为关于经口进食状态和治疗干预的建议提供信息。FEES的次数基于受试者的医疗状况、吞咽困难证据及临床判断。
识别咽期吞咽困难、误吸及误吸风险,以及关于初始进食状态、何时恢复经口进食以及使用何种食团稠度以实现最佳吞咽成功率的建议。
在所有受试者中,连续的FEES检测到咽期吞咽困难、误吸及误吸风险,并能够确定初始进食状态(NPO或PO)、何时恢复成功的经口进食以及使用何种食团稠度以实现最佳吞咽成功率。具体而言,32名受试者中有15名(47%)仅在6至22天内接受了3至5次FEES。及时的连续FEES使32名受试者中的22名(69%)能够尽早且安全地恢复经口饮食。
基于FEES结果恢复经口饮食的受试者均未发生误吸性肺炎。因此,连续的FEES能够成功且高效地将进食状态从NPO改为PO,且不产生不良健康后果。就预约安排、交通、患者问题及人员需求而言,FEES是一种高效的程序。