Simões J A, Giraldo P C, Faúndes A
Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brasil.
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1998;6(3):129-33. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(1998)6:3<129::AID-IDOG6>3.0.CO;2-S.
The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of cervicovaginal infections in normal third-trimester pregnant women and evaluate the accuracy of clinical diagnosis.
A total of 328 pregnant women were followed at the Prenatal Outpatient Clinic of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil, from October 1991 to February 1993. The clinical diagnosis was based on the characteristics of the vaginal discharge, and the etiological diagnosis was based on bacterioscopy of the vaginal secretion and direct immunofluorescence for Chlamydia trachomatis. The data were analyzed statistically, determining the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of the clinical diagnosis related to the laboratory diagnosis of the different infections.
The prevalence of infection was 39.6% (Candida albicans, 19.2%; bacterial vaginosis, 9.5%; intermediate vaginal flora, 6.7%; Chlamydia trachomatis, 2.1%; and vaginal trichomoniasis, 2.1%). The accuracy of clinical diagnosis was low, with sensitivity between 50% and 65% and specificity around 60%, with the exception of trichomoniasis, which showed a sensitivity of 100% and chlamydia, with a sensitivity of 0% and a specificity of 100%.
The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of infections was low, specifically with respect to the positive predictive value. The results demonstrate the need for specific testing of cervicovaginal infections at prenatal visits. Reliance on simple vaginal examination results in a low yield for detection of vaginal infections.
本研究旨在确定妊娠晚期正常孕妇宫颈阴道感染的患病率,并评估临床诊断的准确性。
1991年10月至1993年2月,对巴西坎皮纳斯州立大学医学科学学院妇产科产前门诊的328名孕妇进行了随访。临床诊断基于阴道分泌物的特征,病因诊断基于阴道分泌物的细菌学检查和沙眼衣原体直接免疫荧光检测。对数据进行统计学分析,确定不同感染的临床诊断与实验室诊断相关的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。
感染患病率为39.6%(白色念珠菌,19.2%;细菌性阴道病,9.5%;中间型阴道菌群,6.7%;沙眼衣原体,2.1%;阴道毛滴虫,2.1%)。临床诊断的准确性较低,敏感性在50%至65%之间,特异性约为60%,阴道毛滴虫除外,其敏感性为100%,沙眼衣原体敏感性为0%,特异性为100%。
感染的临床诊断准确性较低,特别是在阳性预测值方面。结果表明产前检查需要对宫颈阴道感染进行特异性检测。仅依靠简单的阴道检查对阴道感染的检出率较低。