Richter D, Spielman A, Matuschka F R
Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Nov;64(11):4596-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.11.4596-4599.1998.
To determine whether prior exposure to Nearctic Ixodes vector ticks protects native reservoir mice from tick-borne infection by Lyme disease spirochetes, we compared their infectivities for white-footed mice and laboratory mice that had been repeatedly infested by noninfected deer ticks. Nymphal ticks readily engorged on tick-exposed laboratory mice, but their feeding success on white-footed mice progressively declined. Tick-borne spirochetes readily infected previously tick-infested mice. Thus, prior infestation by Nearctic ticks does not protect sympatric reservoir mice or Palearctic laboratory mice from infection by sympatric tick-borne spirochetes.
为了确定先前接触新北区硬蜱媒介蜱是否能保护本地宿主小鼠免受莱姆病螺旋体的蜱传播感染,我们比较了它们对曾被未感染的鹿蜱反复叮咬的白足鼠和实验小鼠的感染性。若虫蜱很容易在接触过蜱的实验小鼠身上饱血,但它们在白足鼠身上的取食成功率逐渐下降。蜱传播的螺旋体很容易感染先前被蜱叮咬过的小鼠。因此,先前被新北区蜱叮咬并不能保护同域宿主小鼠或古北区实验小鼠免受同域蜱传播螺旋体的感染。