Ryan C J
Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia.
J Med Ethics. 1998 Oct;24(5):341-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.5.341.
The slippery slope argument has been the mainstay of many of those opposed to the legalisation of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. In this paper I re-examine the slippery slope in the light of two recent studies that examined the prevalence of medical decisions concerning the end of life in the Netherlands and in Australia. I argue that these two studies have robbed the slippery slope of the source of its power--its intuitive obviousness. Finally I propose that, contrary to the warnings of the slippery slope, the available evidence suggests that the legalisation of physician-assisted suicide might actually decrease the prevalence of non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia.
滑坡论证一直是许多反对医生协助自杀和安乐死合法化的人的主要依据。在本文中,我根据最近两项关于荷兰和澳大利亚临终医疗决策普遍性的研究,重新审视了滑坡论证。我认为这两项研究剥夺了滑坡论证的力量来源——其直观的明显性。最后我提出,与滑坡论证的警告相反,现有证据表明医生协助自杀合法化实际上可能会降低非自愿和非自主安乐死的发生率。