Suppr超能文献

通过酶联免疫吸附测定和流式细胞术研究布鲁氏菌属表面的O-多糖表位异质性

O-Polysaccharide epitopic heterogeneity at the surface of Brucella spp. studied by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and flow cytometry.

作者信息

Cloeckaert A, Weynants V, Godfroid J, Verger J M, Grayon M, Zygmunt M S

机构信息

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Laboratoire de Pathologie Infectieuse et Immunologie, 37380 Nouzilly, France.

出版信息

Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1998 Nov;5(6):862-70. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.5.6.862-870.1998.

Abstract

Smooth Brucella strains are classified into three serotypes, i.e., A+M-, A-M+, and A+M+, according to slide agglutination with A and M monospecific polyclonal sera. The epitopes involved have been located on the O-polysaccharide (O-PS) moiety of the smooth lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS), which represents the most exposed antigenic structure on the surface of Brucella spp. By use of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) a number of epitope specificities on the O-PS have been reported: A, M, and epitopes shared by both A and M dominant strains, which have been named common (C) epitopes. The latter have been further subdivided, according to relative MAb binding in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to A- and M-dominant Brucella strains and to cross-reacting Yersinia enterocolitica O:9, into five epitopic specificities: C (M>A), C (M=A), C/Y (M>A), C/Y (M=A), and C/Y (A>M). In the present study, we studied the occurrence of these epitopes at the surface of representatives of all Brucella species and biovars including the live vaccine strains by analyzing the levels of MAb binding to whole Brucella cells in ELISA and flow cytometry assays. In ELISA, the level of MAb binding correlated well with the previously defined epitope specificity and the serotype defined by polyclonal sera for each Brucella species, biovar, or strain. However, MAbs to the C (M=A) and C (M>A) epitopes showed insignificant binding to B. suis biovar 2 strains and bound at lower titers to B. suis biovar 3 and B. neotomae than to the other Brucella strains. Some of the flow cytometry results were contradictory to those obtained by ELISA. In fact, it appeared by flow cytometry that all O-PS epitopes, including the A and M epitopes, are shared to different degrees by Brucella spp. which nevertheless show a high degree of O-PS heterogeneity according to MAb binding intensities. The subdivision of MAb specificities and Brucella serotypes was therefore less evident by flow cytometry than by ELISA. Whereas in ELISA the MAb specific for the A epitope showed insignificant binding to Y. enterocolitica O:9, this MAb bound strongly to Y. enterocolitica O:9 in flow cytometry. One of the two MAbs specific to the C (M=A) epitope also bound at a low but significant level to B. suis biovar 2 strains. However, as in ELISA the MAb specific for the C (M>A) epitope did not bind at all to B. suis biovar 2 strains in flow cytometry. Flow cytometry provided new information regarding specificity of the MAbs and may further explain some aspects of the capacity of passive protection of some MAbs against smooth Brucella infection in mice. As shown in the present study the occurrence of Brucella strains apparently completely devoid of one specific C O-PS epitope (e.g., B. suis biovar 2 devoid of the C [M>A] epitope) offers the possibility of obtaining vaccine strains devoid of a diagnostic O-PS epitope, which could further help to resolve the problem of discriminating infected from vaccinated animals that remains a major goal in brucellosis research.

摘要

根据与A和M单特异性多克隆血清的玻片凝集反应,光滑型布鲁氏菌菌株可分为三种血清型,即A+M-、A-M+和A+M+。所涉及的表位位于光滑型脂多糖(S-LPS)的O-多糖(O-PS)部分,这是布鲁氏菌属表面最暴露的抗原结构。通过使用单克隆抗体(MAb),已报道了O-PS上的许多表位特异性:A、M以及A和M优势菌株共有的表位,后者被命名为共同(C)表位。根据酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)中MAb与A和M优势布鲁氏菌菌株以及交叉反应的小肠结肠炎耶尔森氏菌O:9的相对结合情况,后者进一步细分为五种表位特异性:C(M>A)、C(M=A)、C/Y(M>A)、C/Y(M=A)和C/Y(A>M)。在本研究中,我们通过分析ELISA和流式细胞术测定中MAb与全布鲁氏菌细胞的结合水平,研究了所有布鲁氏菌物种和生物变种(包括活疫苗菌株)代表菌株表面这些表位的出现情况。在ELISA中,MAb的结合水平与先前定义的表位特异性以及每种布鲁氏菌物种、生物变种或菌株的多克隆血清所定义的血清型密切相关。然而,针对C(M=A)和C(M>A)表位的MAb与猪布鲁氏菌生物变种2菌株的结合不明显,与猪布鲁氏菌生物变种3和新墨西哥布鲁氏菌的结合效价低于其他布鲁氏菌菌株。一些流式细胞术结果与ELISA结果相互矛盾。事实上,流式细胞术显示,所有O-PS表位,包括A和M表位,在不同程度上为布鲁氏菌属所共有,不过根据MAb结合强度,它们显示出高度的O-PS异质性。因此,与ELISA相比,流式细胞术中MAb特异性和布鲁氏菌血清型的细分不太明显。虽然在ELISA中,针对A表位的MAb与小肠结肠炎耶尔森氏菌O:9的结合不明显,但在流式细胞术中该MAb与小肠结肠炎耶尔森氏菌O:9强烈结合。针对C(M=A)表位的两种MAb之一也与猪布鲁氏菌生物变种2菌株有低水平但显著的结合。然而,与ELISA一样,针对C(M>A)表位的MAb在流式细胞术中根本不与猪布鲁氏菌生物变种2菌株结合。流式细胞术提供了关于MAb特异性的新信息,并可能进一步解释一些MAb对小鼠光滑型布鲁氏菌感染的被动保护能力的某些方面。如本研究所示,明显完全缺乏一种特定C O-PS表位的布鲁氏菌菌株(例如,缺乏C[M>A]表位的猪布鲁氏菌生物变种2)的出现,为获得缺乏诊断性O-PS表位的疫苗菌株提供了可能性,这可能进一步有助于解决区分感染动物和接种动物的问题,这仍然是布鲁氏菌病研究的一个主要目标。

相似文献

10
Evaluation of Reactivity of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Omp25 of spp.对 spp. 的 Omp25 单克隆抗体反应性的评估
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Apr 21;10:145. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00145. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验