de Pee S, West C E, Permaesih D, Martuti S, Hautvast J G
Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Netherlands.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1998 Nov;68(5):1058-67. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/68.5.1058.
The objectives of this study were to quantify the effectiveness of dietary retinol sources, orange fruit, and dark-green, leafy vegetables in improving vitamin A status, and to test whether orange fruit is a better source of vitamin A and carotenoids than are leafy vegetables. Anemic schoolchildren aged 7-11 y (n = 238) in West Java, Indonesia, were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 groups to consume 2 complete meals/d, 6 d/wk, for 9 wk: 1) 556 retinol equivalents (RE)/d from retinol-rich food (n = 48); 2) 509 RE/d from fruit (n = 49); 3) 684 RE/d from dark-green, leafy vegetables and carrots (n = 45); and 4) 44 RE/d from low-retinol, low-carotene food (n = 46). Mean changes in serum retinol concentrations of the retinol-rich, fruit, vegetable, and low-retinol, low-carotene groups were 0.23 (95% CI: 0.18, 0.28), 0.12 (0.06, 0.18), 0.07 (0.03,0.11), and 0.00 (-0.06, 0.05) micromol/L, respectively. Mean changes in serum beta-carotene concentrations in the vegetable and fruit groups were 0.14 (0.12, 0.17) and 0.52 (0.43, 0.60) micromol/L, respectively. Until now, it has been assumed that 6 microg dietary beta-carotene is equivalent to 1 RE. On the basis of this study, however, the equivalent of 1 RE would be 12 microg beta-carotene (95% CI: 6 microg, 29 microg) for fruit and 26 microg beta-carotene (95% CI: 13 microg, 76 microg) for leafy vegetables and carrots. Thus, the apparent mean vitamin A activity of carotenoids in fruit and in leafy vegetables and carrots was 50% (95% CI: 21%, 100%) and 23% (95% CI: 8%, 46%) of that assumed, respectively. This has important implications for choosing strategies for controlling vitamin A deficiency. Research should be directed toward ways of improving bioavailability and bioconversion of dietary carotenoids, focusing on factors such as intestinal parasites, absorption inhibitors, and food matrixes.
本研究的目的是量化膳食视黄醇来源、橙色水果和深绿色叶菜类蔬菜在改善维生素A状况方面的效果,并测试橙色水果是否比叶菜类蔬菜是更好的维生素A和类胡萝卜素来源。印度尼西亚西爪哇省7至11岁的贫血学童(n = 238)被随机分为4组中的1组,每天食用2顿完整餐食,每周6天,共9周:1)来自富含视黄醇食物的556视黄醇当量(RE)/天(n = 48);2)来自水果的509 RE/天(n = 49);3)来自深绿色叶菜类蔬菜和胡萝卜的684 RE/天(n = 45);4)来自低视黄醇、低类胡萝卜素食物的44 RE/天(n = 46)。富含视黄醇组、水果组、蔬菜组和低视黄醇、低类胡萝卜素组血清视黄醇浓度的平均变化分别为0.23(95%CI:0.18,0.28)、0.12(0.06,0.18)、0.07(0.03,0.11)和0.00(-0.06,0.05)μmol/L。蔬菜组和水果组血清β-胡萝卜素浓度的平均变化分别为0.14(0.12,0.17)和0.52(0.43,0.60)μmol/L。到目前为止,一直假定6μg膳食β-胡萝卜素相当于1 RE。然而,基于本研究,对于水果,1 RE相当于12μgβ-胡萝卜素(95%CI:6μg,29μg),对于叶菜类蔬菜和胡萝卜,1 RE相当于26μgβ-胡萝卜素(95%CI:13μg,76μg)。因此,水果以及叶菜类蔬菜和胡萝卜中类胡萝卜素的表观平均维生素A活性分别为假定值的50%(95%CI:21%,100%)和23%(95%CI:8%,46%)。这对于选择控制维生素A缺乏的策略具有重要意义。研究应针对改善膳食类胡萝卜素的生物利用度和生物转化的方法,重点关注肠道寄生虫、吸收抑制剂和食物基质等因素。