Heart. 1998 Aug;80(2):121-6.
(1) To compare mortality estimates based on clinicopathological diagnoses of death from acute coronary heart disease with official estimates of coronary heart disease mortality; (2) to compare present day mortality figures with those from earlier reports.
Prospective community study over the two years 1994 and 1995.
The health districts of Brighton, South Glamorgan, and York.
1589 men and women under 75 years of age who, based on our study criteria, died from acute coronary events were compared with certified cases of coronary death in the same age group.
(1) Comparison of the underlying cause recorded on death certificates with the diagnosis of acute coronary death defined by our study criteria; (2) comparison of age specific mortality figures of the present with earlier studies.
Up to age 65, age specific mortality for coronary heart disease, using study criteria, was similar to official estimates. However, at ages 65-74 years there was a shortfall in study deaths of about 20% compared with official figures. One reason for this was that many death certificates in elderly people attributed death to coronary disease in the absence of confirmatory evidence. Despite this, deaths in the under 65 age group in the 1990s appear to be occurring in people who are about 10 years older than was the case during the 1970s.
There are differences, most noticeable in elderly subjects, between estimates of coronary mortality made according to strict clinical and pathological definitions and official rates based on death certification. Recognition of these differences will be important for future epidemiological studies.
(1)比较基于急性冠状动脉心脏病临床病理诊断得出的死亡估计数与官方冠心病死亡率估计数;(2)比较当前死亡率数据与早期报告中的数据。
1994年和1995年这两年的前瞻性社区研究。
布莱顿、南格拉摩根和约克的卫生区。
1589名75岁以下因急性冠状动脉事件死亡的男性和女性,根据我们的研究标准,将其与同年龄组经认证的冠心病死亡病例进行比较。
(1)将死亡证明上记录的根本死因与我们研究标准所定义的急性冠状动脉死亡诊断进行比较;(2)将当前特定年龄组的死亡率数据与早期研究进行比较。
在65岁及以下,按照研究标准得出的冠心病特定年龄死亡率与官方估计数相似。然而,在65 - 74岁年龄段,与官方数据相比,研究中的死亡人数短缺约20%。原因之一是许多老年人的死亡证明在缺乏确证的情况下将死亡归因于冠心病。尽管如此,20世纪90年代65岁以下年龄组的死亡似乎发生在比20世纪70年代大约大10岁的人群中。
根据严格的临床和病理定义得出的冠心病死亡率估计数与基于死亡证明的官方死亡率之间存在差异,在老年受试者中最为明显。认识到这些差异对未来的流行病学研究很重要。