• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险与全科医生预算负责人。

Risk and the general practitioner budget holder.

作者信息

Martin S, Rice N, Smith P C

机构信息

Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, U.K.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(10):1547-54. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00231-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00231-7
PMID:9823050
Abstract

For most individuals, the use made of health care in a given year is determined principally by unpredictable random incidents. Of course, some individuals have a predictably higher predisposition to illness than others. However, the general consensus is that only a fraction of individual variability in health care costs can be predicted. The purpose of this paper is to explore the implications of this inherent randomness for setting health care budgets for general practitioner purchasers of health care. The paper argues that variability in utilization in health care is very high: that no capitation formula can ever completely capture that variability, even for large populations: that the variability may give rise to certain dysfunctional consequences if not managed carefully; and that therefore careful attention should be given to the managerial arrangements associated with any devolution of health care budgets.

摘要

对于大多数人来说,某一年中医疗保健的使用情况主要由不可预测的随机事件决定。当然,一些人比其他人更容易患病,这是可以预见的。然而,普遍的共识是,医疗保健成本中只有一小部分个体差异是可以预测的。本文的目的是探讨这种内在随机性对为医疗保健的全科医生购买者设定医疗保健预算的影响。本文认为,医疗保健使用情况的变异性非常高:即使对于大量人群,任何人均预算公式都无法完全捕捉到这种变异性;如果管理不善,这种变异性可能会导致某些功能失调的后果;因此,应仔细关注与医疗保健预算下放相关的管理安排。

相似文献

1
Risk and the general practitioner budget holder.风险与全科医生预算负责人。
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(10):1547-54. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00231-7.
2
PBMA (programme budgeting marginal analysis)--its role in the future purchasing arrangements for health care services.规划预算边际分析(PBMA)——其在未来医疗服务采购安排中的作用。
Health Policy. 1995 Aug;33(2):157-60. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)93675-q.
3
The threat of 'cream skimming' in the post-reform NHS.改革后的英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中“撇脂”的威胁。
J Health Econ. 1994 Mar;13(1):31-60. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)90003-5.
4
Controversies in primary care. Setting prescribing budgets in general practice. Capitation based prescribing budgets will not work.基层医疗中的争议。在全科医疗中设定处方预算。基于人头数的处方预算行不通。
BMJ. 1998 Mar 7;316(7133):748-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.748.
5
Addressing the inequity of capitation by variable soft contracts.通过可变软合同解决按人头付费的不公平问题。
Health Econ. 1999 Jun;8(4):335-43. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199906)8:4<335::aid-hec433>3.0.co;2-o.
6
Issues for fundholding in Australian general practice.澳大利亚全科医疗中的基金持有问题。
Med J Aust. 1996 Feb 19;164(4):215-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb94141.x.
7
Attempt at deriving a formula for setting general practitioner fundholding budgets.尝试推导制定全科医生基金持有预算的公式。
BMJ. 1994 Oct 22;309(6961):1059-64. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6961.1059.
8
Fundholding and rationing by general practitioners.全科医生的基金持有与配给
Med J Aust. 1995 Sep 18;163(6):319-20. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb124602.x.
9
General practitioners and the new contract: promoting better health through financial incentives.全科医生与新合同:通过经济激励促进更健康的体魄
Health Policy. 1993 Sep;25(1-2):39-50. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(93)90101-t.
10
A reforming accountability: GPs and health reform in New Zealand.改革问责制:新西兰的全科医生与医疗改革
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1997 Jul-Sep;12(3):169-85. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199707/09)12:3<169::AID-HPM478>3.0.CO;2-#.

引用本文的文献

1
A person based formula for allocating commissioning funds to general practices in England: development of a statistical model.英格兰为一般执业医师分配开业资金的基于人头的公式:统计模型的开发。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 22;343:d6608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6608.
2
Resource allocation and purchasing in the health sector: the English experience.卫生部门的资源分配与采购:英国的经验
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Nov;86(11):884-8. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.049528.
3
Is bigger better for primary care groups and trusts?对于初级保健团体和信托机构来说,规模越大越好吗?
BMJ. 2001 Mar 10;322(7286):599-602. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7286.599.