Patel V L, Kaufman D R
Center for Medical Education, McGill University, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Nov-Dec;5(6):489-92. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050489.
Because scientific research is guided by concerns for uncovering "fundamental truths," its time frame differs from that of design, development, and practice, which are driven by immediate needs for practical solutions. In medicine, however, as in other disciplines, basic scientists, developers, and practitioners are being called on increasingly to forge new alliances and work toward common goals. The authors propose that medical informatics be construed as a local science of design. A local science seeks to explain aspects of a domain rather than derive a set of unifying principles. Design is concerned with the creation, implementation, and adaptation of artifacts in a range of settings. The authors explore the implications of this point of view and endeavor to characterize the nature of informatics research, the relationship between theory and practice, and issues of scientific validity and generalizability. They argue for a more pluralistic approach to medical informatics in building a cumulative body of knowledge.
由于科学研究以揭示“基本真理”为导向,其时间框架与设计、开发和实践不同,后者受实际解决方案的迫切需求驱动。然而,在医学领域,如同在其他学科一样,基础科学家、开发者和从业者正越来越多地被要求建立新的联盟并朝着共同目标努力。作者提议将医学信息学理解为一门局部的设计科学。局部科学旨在解释一个领域的各个方面,而非推导一套统一的原则。设计涉及在一系列环境中人工制品的创建、实施和适配。作者探讨了这一观点的影响,并试图描述信息学研究的本质、理论与实践的关系以及科学有效性和普遍性的问题。他们主张在构建累积性知识体系时,采用更加多元化的方法来进行医学信息学研究。