• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2.0%葡萄糖酸氯己定与5.25%次氯酸钠作为牙髓病抗菌冲洗剂的比较。

A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants.

作者信息

Jeansonne M J, White R R

机构信息

Dental Branch, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston.

出版信息

J Endod. 1994 Jun;20(6):276-8. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80815-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80815-0
PMID:7931023
Abstract

Sodium hypochlorite, as an endodontic irrigant, poses problems including toxicity, odor, and discoloration of operatory items. An equally effective, but safer irrigant is desirable. Therefore, we compared the antimicrobial activity of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate with that of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in an in vitro root canal system. Freshly extracted human teeth with pulpal pathosis were instrumented using chlorhexidine, sodium hypochlorite, or saline as irrigants. Microbiological samples were taken from the teeth immediately after accessing the canal, after instrumentation and irrigation, and after standing in an anaerobic atmosphere for 24 h. Irrigation with chlorhexidine or sodium hypochlorite significantly reduced the numbers of postirrigant positive cultures and colony-forming units compared with saline-irrigated teeth. The number of postirrigant positive cultures and the number of colony-forming units in positive cultures obtained from chlorhexidine-treated teeth were lower than the numbers obtained from sodium hypochlorite-treated teeth, but the differences were not statistically significant.

摘要

次氯酸钠作为一种根管冲洗剂,存在诸如毒性、气味以及使手术器械变色等问题。因此,需要一种同样有效但更安全的冲洗剂。所以,我们在体外根管系统中比较了2.0%葡萄糖酸氯己定和5.25%次氯酸钠的抗菌活性。将患有牙髓病变的新鲜拔除的人牙,分别使用氯己定、次氯酸钠或生理盐水作为冲洗剂进行根管预备。在开髓后、根管预备和冲洗后以及在厌氧环境中放置24小时后,立即从牙齿采集微生物样本。与用生理盐水冲洗的牙齿相比,用氯己定或次氯酸钠冲洗显著减少了冲洗后阳性培养物的数量和菌落形成单位。从氯己定处理的牙齿获得的冲洗后阳性培养物数量和阳性培养物中的菌落形成单位数量低于从次氯酸钠处理的牙齿获得的数量,但差异无统计学意义。

相似文献

1
A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants.2.0%葡萄糖酸氯己定与5.25%次氯酸钠作为牙髓病抗菌冲洗剂的比较。
J Endod. 1994 Jun;20(6):276-8. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80815-0.
2
Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrigants.2.5%次氯酸钠和0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定单独及联合作为根管冲洗剂的抗菌活性。
J Endod. 1998 Jul;24(7):472-6. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80049-6.
3
[A comparative in-vitro study of the bactericidal efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate plus cetrimide on root canal anaerobic bacterial flora].次氯酸钠与葡萄糖酸氯己定加溴化十六烷基三甲铵对根管厌氧细菌菌群杀菌效果的体外比较研究
Minerva Stomatol. 1998 Sep;47(9):381-6.
4
In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis.根管冲洗剂对粪肠球菌的体外抗菌效果
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 May;103(5):702-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.007. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
5
Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants.不同根管冲洗剂的抗菌及毒性作用比较
Int Endod J. 2003 Jun;36(6):423-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00673.x.
6
Antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in infected root canal: in vivo study.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定和5.25%次氯酸钠在感染根管中的抗菌活性:体内研究
J Endod. 2004 Feb;30(2):84-7. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200402000-00005.
7
In vitro assessment of the immediate and prolonged antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis.洗必泰凝胶作为根管冲洗剂对粪肠球菌的即时和持久抗菌作用的体外评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Jun;99(6):768-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.08.026.
8
Effects of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite on the microhardness of root canal dentin.洗必泰和次氯酸钠对根管牙本质显微硬度的影响。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Oct;104(4):e125-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.04.019. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
9
Comparison of antimicrobial substantivity of root canal irrigants in instrumented root canals up to 72 h: an in vitro study.根管冲洗剂在预备根管内至72小时抗菌持续性的比较:一项体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Jan-Mar;29(1):28-33. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.79925.
10
Antifungal efficacy of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 17% EDTA with and without an antifungal agent.含或不含抗真菌剂的 5.25%次氯酸钠、2%葡萄糖酸氯己定和 17%依地酸的抗真菌效果。
J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):675-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.01.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical investigation of levels of lipopolysaccharides and lipoteichoic acid after antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in teeth with secondary endodontic infection: an observational study.抗菌光动力疗法治疗继发牙髓感染牙齿后脂多糖和脂磷壁酸水平的临床研究:一项观察性研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jun 10;40(1):267. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04523-7.
2
Normal Saline or Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation for Vital Pulp Therapy? A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.生理盐水或次氯酸钠冲洗用于活髓治疗?一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
Eur Endod J. 2024 Aug 22;9(3):180-190. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.30932.
3
Endodontic irrigants from a comprehensive perspective.
从综合角度看根管冲洗剂
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Jul 26;12(21):4460-4468. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4460.
4
Elimination of E. faecalis with NaOCl versus chlorhexidine gluconate from primary molar root canal systems: an ex vivo model study.使用次氯酸钠与葡萄糖酸氯己定消除乳磨牙根管系统中粪肠球菌的体外模型研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Apr 23;28(5):265. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05621-6.
5
Effect of two irrigating solutions on antimicrobial activity and clinical and radiographic success after endodontic treatment in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial.两种冲洗液对乳牙牙髓治疗后抗菌活性及临床和放射学疗效的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 8;28(1):81. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05398-0.
6
The Impact of Different Irrigation Regimens on the Chemical Structure and Cleanliness of Root Canal Dentin.不同冲洗方案对根管牙本质化学结构和清洁度的影响
Iran Endod J. 2023;18(4):224-232. doi: 10.22037/iej.v18i4.38004.
7
Antimicrobial Properties and Substantivity of Gentamicin, Amoxicillin and Metronidazole (GAM) Antibiotic Solution with Chitosan as a Root Canal Irrigant - A Preliminary Study.以壳聚糖为根管冲洗剂的庆大霉素、阿莫西林和甲硝唑(GAM)抗生素溶液的抗菌性能及持续性——一项初步研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S341-S345. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_500_22. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
Comparative evaluation of antifungal efficacy of conventional endodontic irrigants and chitosan nanoparticles.传统根管冲洗剂与壳聚糖纳米颗粒抗真菌效果的比较评价
J Conserv Dent. 2023 Mar-Apr;26(2):226-229. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_617_22. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
9
Accidental Injection of Chlorhexidine during Endodontic Therapy.根管治疗期间意外注射洗必泰
Iran Endod J. 2021;16(2):123-126. doi: 10.22037/iej.v16i2.32954.
10
An Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against , Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser.一项比较0.2%壳聚糖、3%次氯酸钠、2%氯己定单独及与二极管激光联合使用时抗菌效果的研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):109-114. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2351.