Brooke I, Cocker J, Delic J I, Payne M, Jones K, Gregg N C, Dyne D
Health and Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, U.K.
Ann Occup Hyg. 1998 Nov;42(8):531-40. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4878(98)00064-7.
The control of exposure to hazardous substances in the workplace has traditionally focused on uptake via the inhalation route. Control of skin uptake has generally been considered for solids and liquids but the potential for uptake from vapours and gases has received relatively little attention. The current work was undertaken to establish a methodology to study the dermal uptake from vapours and to provide new and comparative information on a range of substance vapours. Groups of human volunteers were exposed to a small range of substances either 'whole body' or via the skin only. Substances (xylene, toluene, tetrahydrofuran [THF], methyl ethyl ketone [MEK] and 1-methoxypropan-2-ol [M2P]) were selected on the basis of their predicted dermal uptake from the vapour phase; their industrial use and potential for occupational exposure; the existence of a health-based occupational exposure limit; the availability of an analytical technique(s) for the substance and/or metabolite(s); and as representatives of chemical classes. Exposures were for four hours generally at the level of the UK Occupational Exposure Standard. Uptake was assessed by monitoring of parent or metabolite in blood, single breath or urine following exposure. Uptake of xylene, toluene and THF vapours via the skin under the conditions of this study was estimated to contribute around 1-2% of the body burden received following whole body (including inhalation) exposure. MEK showed more uptake via the skin, contributing around 3-3.5% of the body burden. Most dermal uptake was seen for the glycol ether M2P for which estimates of between 5-10% of whole body exposure body burden were obtained. The results of this and other studies indicate that uptake of vapours across the skin can occur but that for some substances (e.g., xylene, toluene, THF) this is likely to contribute little to the body burden. For other substances, such as the glycol ethers, skin uptake from vapours may be an important contributor to total uptake, particularly in situations where respiratory protective equipment is used to control inhalation exposure.
传统上,对工作场所有害物质暴露的控制主要集中在通过吸入途径的摄取。对于固体和液体,通常会考虑控制皮肤摄取,但来自蒸气和气体的摄取可能性相对较少受到关注。当前的工作旨在建立一种研究蒸气经皮摄取的方法,并提供一系列物质蒸气的新的比较信息。将几组人类志愿者暴露于一小范围的物质,要么是“全身”暴露,要么仅通过皮肤暴露。选择物质(二甲苯、甲苯、四氢呋喃[THF]、甲乙酮[MEK]和1-甲氧基-2-丙醇[M2P])是基于它们从气相中的预测经皮摄取;它们的工业用途和职业暴露可能性;基于健康的职业暴露限值的存在;该物质和/或代谢物的分析技术的可用性;以及作为化学类别的代表。暴露通常在英国职业暴露标准水平下进行四小时。通过在暴露后监测血液、单次呼吸或尿液中的母体或代谢物来评估摄取。在本研究条件下,经皮肤摄取的二甲苯、甲苯和THF蒸气估计占全身(包括吸入)暴露后所接受的体内负荷的约1-2%。MEK经皮肤摄取更多,占体内负荷的约3-3.5%。二醇醚M2P的经皮摄取最多,估计占全身暴露体内负荷的5-10%。这项研究和其他研究的结果表明,蒸气可通过皮肤摄取,但对于某些物质(如二甲苯、甲苯、THF),这可能对体内负荷贡献很小。对于其他物质,如二醇醚,蒸气经皮肤摄取可能是总摄取的重要贡献者,特别是在使用呼吸防护设备来控制吸入暴露的情况下。