Fischer B, Biscaldi M, Otto P
Department of Neurophysiology, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 1993 Sep;31(9):887-906. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90146-q.
The characteristics of visually guided saccadic eye movements were compared in 12 normal adult subjects and 12 test subjects of normal intelligence, but with problems in reading and writing. All subjects were examined psychometrically for different cognitive abilities, and for their reading and writing capabilities. The anamnestic reports about their reading and writing problems earlier in their lives were analysed. Based on scores of the writing and reading tests, the test group was subdivided into two subgroups: A and B (group A reached medium, group B very low scores in both tests). Five different non-cognitive eye movement tasks were applied: two single tasks (gap and overlap) requiring single saccades from a fixation point to a peripherally appearing target and three sequential tasks (overlap, synchronous, and simultaneous) requiring sequences of saccades to four equally spaced targets presented sequentially to the right side from an initial fixation point. Many parameters of the subjects' eye movement performance were determined and their mean values were calculated for each subject. The Student t-test revealed that the eye movement data of the two test groups deviated differently from the data of the control group. Group B had the largest deviation of the eye movement parameter from the control group. The differentiating parameters were the consistency of target acquisition, the saccadic reaction time, and the number of anticipatory responses in the single target tasks. In the sequential tasks these differences were in the amplitude, the number of saccades, and the fixation durations. The incidence of regressive saccades did not discriminate between test subjects and controls. The possible underlying deficits in the attentional control over the saccadic system and their implications for reading are discussed.
在12名正常成年受试者和12名智力正常但读写有问题的受试对象中,对视觉引导的扫视眼动特征进行了比较。所有受试者均接受了不同认知能力以及读写能力的心理测量检查。分析了他们关于早年读写问题的既往报告。根据读写测试分数,将测试组分为两个亚组:A组和B组(A组在两项测试中得分中等,B组得分极低)。应用了五种不同的非认知眼动任务:两项单任务(间隙和重叠),要求从注视点向周边出现的目标进行单次扫视;三项连续任务(重叠、同步和同时),要求从初始注视点开始,向右侧依次呈现的四个等距目标进行一系列扫视。确定了受试者眼动表现的许多参数,并计算了每个受试者的平均值。学生t检验显示,两个测试组的眼动数据与对照组数据的偏差不同。B组眼动参数与对照组的偏差最大。区分参数为单目标任务中目标获取的一致性、扫视反应时间和预期反应次数。在连续任务中,这些差异体现在幅度、扫视次数和注视持续时间上。回返扫视的发生率在受试对象和对照组之间没有差异。讨论了扫视系统注意控制中可能存在的潜在缺陷及其对阅读的影响。