Talley N J, Meineche-Schmidt V, Paré P, Duckworth M, Räisänen P, Pap A, Kordecki H, Schmid V
Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Nov;12(11):1055-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00410.x.
The efficacy of H2-receptor antagonists in functional dyspepsia is equivocal and the therapeutic place of proton pump inhibitors in functional dyspepsia is unknown.
To evaluate the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor therapy in functional dyspepsia.
Patients (n = 1262) with a clinical diagnosis of functional dyspepsia (persistent or recurrent epigastric pain or discomfort for at least 1 month and a normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy) were randomized to receive omeprazole 20 mg, 10 mg or identical placebo, for 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed using validated measures. Helicobacter pylori status was determined pre-entry by a 13C-urea breath test.
On an intention-to-treat analysis (n=1248), complete symptom relief was observed in 38% on omeprazole 20 mg, compared with 36% on omeprazole 10 mg and 28% on placebo (P = 0.002 and 0.02, respectively). Among those with ulcer-like and reflux-like dyspepsia, complete symptom relief was achieved in 40% and 54% on omeprazole 20 mg, and 35% and 45% on omeprazole 10 mg, respectively, compared with 27% and 23% on placebo (all P < 0.05, except omeprazole 10 mg in ulcer-like dyspepsia, P = 0.08). There was no significant benefit of omeprazole over placebo in dysmotility-like dyspepsia. Symptom relief was similar in H. pylori-positive and negative cases.
Omeprazole is modestly superior to placebo in functional dyspepsia at standard (20 mg) and low doses (10 mg) but not in patients with dysmotility-like dyspepsia.
H2受体拮抗剂在功能性消化不良中的疗效尚不明确,质子泵抑制剂在功能性消化不良中的治疗地位也不清楚。
评估质子泵抑制剂治疗功能性消化不良的疗效。
临床诊断为功能性消化不良(持续性或复发性上腹部疼痛或不适至少1个月,且上消化道内镜检查正常)的患者(n = 1262)被随机分为接受20毫克奥美拉唑、10毫克奥美拉唑或相同安慰剂治疗4周。使用经过验证的方法评估症状。在入组前通过13C尿素呼气试验确定幽门螺杆菌感染状况。
在意向性分析(n = 1248)中,20毫克奥美拉唑组有38%的患者症状完全缓解,10毫克奥美拉唑组为36%,安慰剂组为28%(P分别为0.002和0.02)。在溃疡样和反流样消化不良患者中,20毫克奥美拉唑组症状完全缓解的比例分别为40%和54%,10毫克奥美拉唑组分别为35%和45%,而安慰剂组分别为27%和23%(除溃疡样消化不良中10毫克奥美拉唑组P = 0.08外,其余P均<0.05)。在动力障碍样消化不良中,奥美拉唑与安慰剂相比无显著益处。幽门螺杆菌阳性和阴性病例的症状缓解情况相似。
在标准剂量(20毫克)和低剂量(10毫克)下,奥美拉唑在功能性消化不良中略优于安慰剂,但在动力障碍样消化不良患者中并非如此。