Yoshimura N, Campbell L, Hashimoto T, Kinoshita H, Okayasu T, Wilman C, Coggon D, Croft P, Cooper C
Department of Public Health, Wakayama Medical College, Japan.
Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Nov;37(11):1193-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.11.1193.
Geographic differences in the prevalence of hip osteoarthritis (OA) have been ascribed to differences in the frequency of acetabular dysplasia among different ethnic groups. However, there are few data on the shape of the acetabulum in various populations around the world. We examined this issue in samples of pelvic radiographs from Britain and Japan.
Measurements were made on the pelvic radiographs of 1303 men and 195 women, aged 60-75 yr, who attended for i.v. urography in two British centres. These were compared with 99 men and 99 women aged 60-79 yr who were included in a population-based study in a rural community in Japan, and who agreed to undergo standardized pelvic radiography. Acetabular dysplasia was assessed by morphometric measurement of the centre-edge (CE) angle and acetabular depth.
The mean CE angle among men was 36 degrees (95% CI 35-37 degrees ) in Britain and 31 degrees (95% CI 29-32 degrees ) in Japan; that in women was 37 degrees (95%, CI 36-38 degrees ) in Britain and 31 degrees (95% CI 29 33 degrees ) in Japan. The mean values of acetabular depth were also significantly (P < 0.001) lower in Japan than in Britain. However, the prevalence of hip OA was lower in Japan (0% in men, 2% in women) than in Britain ( 11% in men, 4.8 / in women). In a random effects model, there were negative relationships between measures of acetabular dysplasia and minimum joint space among individuals.
We conclude that there are marked differences in pelvic morphometry between Britain and Japan. The acetabular dimensions of Japanese subjects are considerably shallower than those of their British counterparts of similar age and sex. Nevertheless, hip OA is more frequent in Britain than in Japan. Further studies are required on the risk factors for hip OA in Oriental populations, in order that the aetiology of this disorder can be better understood.
髋骨关节炎(OA)患病率的地域差异被归因于不同种族髋臼发育不良频率的差异。然而,关于世界各地不同人群髋臼形状的数据很少。我们在来自英国和日本的骨盆X光片样本中研究了这个问题。
对在两个英国中心接受静脉肾盂造影的1303名男性和195名女性(年龄60 - 75岁)的骨盆X光片进行测量。将这些数据与日本一个农村社区基于人群的研究中纳入的99名男性和99名女性(年龄60 - 79岁)的数据进行比较,这些日本参与者同意接受标准化骨盆X光检查。通过中心边缘(CE)角和髋臼深度的形态测量来评估髋臼发育不良。
英国男性的平均CE角为36度(95%可信区间35 - 37度),日本男性为31度(95%可信区间29 - 32度);英国女性的平均CE角为37度(95%可信区间36 - 38度),日本女性为31度(95%可信区间29 - 33度)。日本髋臼深度的平均值也显著低于英国(P < 0.001)。然而,日本髋OA的患病率低于英国(男性为0%,女性为2%)(英国男性为11%,女性为4.8%)。在随机效应模型中,个体髋臼发育不良测量值与最小关节间隙之间存在负相关关系。
我们得出结论,英国和日本之间骨盆形态测量存在显著差异。日本受试者的髋臼尺寸比年龄和性别相似的英国受试者浅得多。然而,髋OA在英国比在日本更常见。需要对东方人群髋OA的危险因素进行进一步研究,以便更好地理解这种疾病的病因。