Suppr超能文献

磁共振胰胆管造影在胆总管结石诊断中的应用:与参考成像方法的前瞻性比较

Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method.

作者信息

Zidi S H, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Rocher L, Fritsch J, Choury A D, Pelletier G

机构信息

Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Bicêtre Hospital, 94 275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.

出版信息

Gut. 1999 Jan;44(1):118-22. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.1.118.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) is a new technique for non-invasive imaging of the biliary tract.

AIM

To assess the results of MRC in patients with suspected bile duct stones as compared with those obtained with reference imaging methods.

PATIENTS/METHODS: 70 patients (34 men and 36 women, mean (SD) age 71 (15.5) years; median 75) with suspected bile duct stones were included (cholangitis, 33; pancreatitis, three; suspected post-cholecystectomy choledocholithiasis, nine; cholestasis, six; stones suspected on ultrasound or computed tomography scan, 19). MR cholangiograms with two dimensional turbo spin echo sequences were acquired. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with or without sphincterotomy (n = 63), endosonography (n = 5), or intraoperative cholangiography (n = 2) were the reference imaging techniques used for the study and were performed within 12 hours of MRC. Radiologists were blinded to the results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and previous investigations.

RESULTS

49 patients (70%) had bile duct stones on reference imaging (common bile duct, 44, six of which impacted in the papilla; intrahepatic, four; cystic duct stump, one). Stone size ranged from 1 to 20 mm (mean 6.1, median 5.5). Twenty seven patients (55%) had bile duct stones smaller than 6 mm. MRC diagnostic accuracy for bile duct lithiasis was: sensitivity, 57.1%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%; negative predictive value, 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Stones smaller than 6 mm are still often missed by MRC when standard equipment is used. The general introduction of new technical improvements is needed before this method can be considered reliable for the diagnosis of bile duct stones.

摘要

背景

磁共振胆胰管造影(MRC)是一种用于胆道无创成像的新技术。

目的

与参考成像方法相比,评估MRC在疑似胆管结石患者中的检查结果。

患者/方法:纳入70例疑似胆管结石患者(34例男性,36例女性,平均(标准差)年龄71(15.5)岁;中位数75岁)(胆管炎33例;胰腺炎3例;疑似胆囊切除术后胆总管结石9例;胆汁淤积6例;超声或计算机断层扫描怀疑有结石19例)。采用二维快速自旋回波序列进行磁共振胆胰管造影。研究采用的参考成像技术为内镜逆行胰胆管造影(有或无括约肌切开术,n = 63)、内镜超声检查(n = 5)或术中胆管造影(n = 2),且均在MRC检查后12小时内进行。放射科医生对内镜逆行胰胆管造影结果及既往检查情况不知情。

结果

参考成像显示49例患者(70%)有胆管结石(胆总管结石44例,其中6例嵌顿于乳头;肝内结石4例;胆囊管残端结石1例)。结石大小为1至20毫米(平均6.1毫米,中位数5.5毫米)。27例患者(55%)的胆管结石小于6毫米。MRC对胆管结石的诊断准确性为:敏感性57.1%;特异性100%;阳性预测值100%;阴性预测值50%。

结论

使用标准设备时,MRC仍经常漏诊小于6毫米的结石。在该方法被认为可可靠诊断胆管结石之前,需要普遍引入新的技术改进。

相似文献

2
Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiography.胆总管结石:磁共振胰胆管造影评估
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Dec;167(6):1441-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956574.

引用本文的文献

3
Intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis: are we on the right path?胆总管结石的中度风险:我们走在正确的道路上吗?
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Mar 27;85(4):659-664. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000124. eCollection 2023 Apr.

本文引用的文献

7
Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.内镜下胆管括约肌切开术的并发症。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 26;335(13):909-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609263351301.
10
Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography.磁共振胰胆管造影的现状
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Jun;166(6):1285-95. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.6.8633434.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验