Lee B F, Chiu N T, Chang J K, Liu G C, Yu H S
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical College Hospital, Taiwan.
J Nucl Med. 1998 Dec;39(12):2128-31.
The aim of our study was to investigate the diagnostic value of scans with 99mTc(V)-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) to localize bone and joint infection compared with scans using 67Ga.
Thirty-six patients referred for investigation of bone and joint infection were studied. In all patients, a bone scan was obtained initially. Subsequently, comparative scans with 99mTc(V)-DMSA and 67Ga were performed 1 wk apart. Microbiological findings, pathologic findings and/or clinical follow-up (until symptoms disappeared) were considered to be proof of the presence of bone and joint infection.
Technetium-99m (V)-DMSA showed greater sensitivity and accuracy than 67Ga in the assessment of bone and joint infection, although the difference was not statistically significant.
In comparison with a 67Ga scan, a 99mTc(V)-DMSA scan, in combination with a bone scan, is a reliable way to diagnose bone and joint infection. Both tracers were useful in the diagnosis of bone and joint infection.
我们研究的目的是调查与使用67Ga扫描相比,99mTc(V)-二巯基丁二酸(DMSA)扫描对定位骨和关节感染的诊断价值。
对36例因骨和关节感染而转诊进行检查的患者进行了研究。所有患者最初均进行了骨扫描。随后,相隔1周分别进行了99mTc(V)-DMSA和67Ga的对比扫描。微生物学检查结果、病理检查结果和/或临床随访(直至症状消失)被视为骨和关节感染存在的证据。
在评估骨和关节感染方面,99mTc(V)-DMSA比67Ga表现出更高的敏感性和准确性,尽管差异无统计学意义。
与67Ga扫描相比,99mTc(V)-DMSA扫描结合骨扫描是诊断骨和关节感染的可靠方法。两种示踪剂在骨和关节感染的诊断中均有用。