• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输送能量对除颤电击阻抗的影响。

The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance.

作者信息

Weiss D N, Shorofsky S R, Peters R W, Gold M R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1998 Sep;2(3):273-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1009745222443.

DOI:10.1023/a:1009745222443
PMID:9870022
Abstract

The impedance of internal defibrillator shocks is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy. To assess the effect of delivered energy on impedance, we studied 97 patients with 4 different lead systems. The lead systems evaluated were two epicardial patches, a hybrid system of a patch and right atrial coil, a dual coil transvenous lead and a transvenous lead with a subcutaneous patch. Impedances were measured for 6 shock energies between 0.1 and 30 J. Shock impedance increased at low energies for all lead systems (p < 0.001), although the rate of increase varied markedly between systems. The energy factor (FE), which is the ratio of impedances for the 0.1 and 10 J shocks, was least for the platinum transvenous lead (1.2 +/- 0.02) and greatest for the titanium hybrid lead (4.2 +/- 0.2). Reversing the polarity of the hybrid lead markedly attenuated the impedance rise. These findings indicate that there is at least a modest rise (20%) of shock impedance at very low delivered energies. The largest increases noted with titanium lead systems are primarily due to polarization. Titanium transvenous leads should be avoided when low energy shocks are utilized such as for the cardioversion of ventricular tachycardia or atrial fibrillation.

摘要

体内除颤电击的阻抗是除颤效果的一个重要决定因素。为了评估输送能量对阻抗的影响,我们对97例使用4种不同导联系统的患者进行了研究。所评估的导联系统包括两片心外膜贴片、一片贴片与右心房线圈的混合系统、双线圈经静脉导联以及带有皮下贴片的经静脉导联。测量了0.1至30 J之间6种电击能量下的阻抗。所有导联系统在低能量时电击阻抗均增加(p < 0.001),尽管不同系统之间增加速率差异显著。能量因子(FE),即0.1 J和10 J电击时阻抗的比值,对于铂制经静脉导联最小(1.2 +/- 0.02),对于钛制混合导联最大(4.2 +/- 0.2)。反转混合导联的极性可显著减弱阻抗上升。这些发现表明,在极低的输送能量下,电击阻抗至少有适度上升(20%)。钛制导联系统中观察到的最大增加主要归因于极化。当使用低能量电击(如用于室性心动过速或心房颤动的心脏复律)时,应避免使用钛制经静脉导联。

相似文献

1
The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance.输送能量对除颤电击阻抗的影响。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1998 Sep;2(3):273-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1009745222443.
2
The effect of shock configuration and delivered energy on defibrillation impedance.电击配置和输送能量对除颤阻抗的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Jan;22(1 Pt 2):165-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00325.x.
3
Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.非开胸导联配置下心外膜补片对除颤阈值的影响。
Circulation. 1995 Nov 15;92(10):3082-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.10.3082.
4
Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.有源胸壁脉冲发生器对心房除颤阈值无益处。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Apr;13(4):332-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00332.x.
5
Utility of low energy test shocks for estimation of cardiac and electrode impedance with implantable defibrillators.低能量测试电击在通过植入式除颤器估计心脏和电极阻抗中的应用。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Apr;13(4):410-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb02055.x.
6
Temporary transvenous cardioversion and defibrillation: a new method for practical tachyarrhythmia management.临时经静脉心脏复律与除颤:一种用于实际快速性心律失常管理的新方法。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 2):168-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04836.x.
7
Multicentre comparison Of shock efficacy using single-vs. Dual-coil lead systems and Anodal vs. cathodaL polarITY defibrillation in patients undergoing transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The MODALITY study.经静脉植入式心脏转复除颤器患者中使用单线圈与双线圈导线系统以及阳极与阴极极性除颤的电击疗效多中心比较。MODALITY研究。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;43(1):45-54. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-9980-9. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
8
Energy, current, and success in defibrillation and cardioversion: clinical studies using an automated impedance-based method of energy adjustment.除颤和心脏复律中的能量、电流与成功:使用基于阻抗自动调整能量方法的临床研究
Circulation. 1988 May;77(5):1038-46. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.77.5.1038.
9
Intraoperative comparison of a subthreshold test pulse with the standard high-energy shock approach for the measurement of defibrillation lead impedance.用于测量除颤导线阻抗的阈下测试脉冲与标准高能电击方法的术中比较。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Jan;17(1):56-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.00261.x.
10
Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks.人体除颤和心脏复律中经胸阻抗的提前预测:阻抗在确定低能量电击成功中的重要性。
Circulation. 1984 Aug;70(2):303-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.2.303.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing defibrillation waveforms for ICDs.优化植入式心律转复除颤器的除颤波形。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2007 Apr;18(3):247-63. doi: 10.1007/s10840-007-9095-z. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
2
Effect of shock polarity on defibrillation thresholds with a hybrid patch-coil lead system.采用混合贴片线圈式导线系统时电击极性对除颤阈值的影响。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Dec;9(3):391-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1027459814028.

本文引用的文献

1
Strength-duration relationship for human transvenous defibrillation.
Circulation. 1997 Nov 18;96(10):3517-20. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3517.
2
Effect of waveform tilt on defibrillation thresholds in humans.波形倾斜对人体除颤阈值的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 May;8(5):496-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb00817.x.
3
Chronic rise in monophasic defibrillation thresholds with a transvenous lead system.
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Feb 15;79(4):502-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00795-3.
4
Effects of an active pectoral-pulse generator shell on defibrillation efficacy with a transvenous lead system.
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Sep 1;78(5):540-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00361-x.
5
Chronic rise in defibrillation threshold with a hybrid lead system.采用混合导联系统时除颤阈值的慢性升高。
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Aug 1;78(3):309-12. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00283-4.
6
Transvenous defibrillation lead systems.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 Jun;7(6):570-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00564.x.
7
A simplified, single-lead unipolar transvenous cardioversion-defibrillation system.
Circulation. 1993 Aug;88(2):543-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.2.543.
8
Effects of voltage and respiration on impedance in nonthoracotomy defibrillation pathways.电压和呼吸对非开胸除颤路径中阻抗的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 1994 Apr 1;73(9):688-92. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90935-0.
9
TiN: a suitable coating for defibrillator electrodes?氮化钛:一种适用于除颤器电极的涂层?
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Jan;18(1 Pt 2):237-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02512.x.
10
Optimal electrode configuration for pectoral transvenous implantable defibrillator without an active can.
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Aug 15;76(5):370-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80103-9.