• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹主动脉手术后患者自控硬膜外给药与静脉注射哌替啶补充硬膜外布比卡因的比较。

Patient-controlled epidural versus intravenous pethidine to supplement epidural bupivacaine after abdominal aortic surgery.

作者信息

Blake D W, Stainsby G V, Bjorksten A R, Dawson P J

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998 Dec;26(6):630-5. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9802600603.

DOI:10.1177/0310057X9802600603
PMID:9876789
Abstract

In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study of 25 patients after abdominal aortic surgery, we compared patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with epidural versus intravenous pethidine. All patients received continuous epidural infusions of 0.125% bupivacaine adjusted to maintain appropriate sensory levels. The 48 hour study period commenced 36 to 48 hours after surgery and covered postoperative days 2 and 3. There was a crossover in PCA mode (epidural or intravenous) after 24 hours. Plasma pethidine concentration at the end of each 24 hour period and the total 24 hour pethidine dose did not change significantly between postoperative days 2 and 3. Pethidine plasma concentration was lower after 24 hours epidural than after intravenous PCA [125 (SD 108) ng/ml versus 171 (SD 107) ng/ml, P = 0.03], although pethidine dose did not differ significantly [mean 147 (SD 124) mg/24 h]. Visual analog pain scores (VAS) did not differ significantly between postoperative days 2 and 3, or at rest between epidural and i.v. groups. However, VAS with coughing and with abdominal palpation were lower in the epidural PCA group (P = 0.05, 0.008). With a background epidural infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine, PCA with epidural pethidine provided better pain control than PCA intravenous pethidine and this was achieved at lower plasma pethidine concentrations.

摘要

在一项针对25例腹主动脉手术后患者的双盲、随机、交叉研究中,我们比较了硬膜外与静脉注射哌替啶的患者自控镇痛(PCA)效果。所有患者均接受0.125%布比卡因的持续硬膜外输注,并进行调整以维持适当的感觉平面。48小时的研究期在手术后36至48小时开始,涵盖术后第2天和第3天。24小时后PCA模式(硬膜外或静脉)交叉。术后第2天和第3天之间,每24小时末期的血浆哌替啶浓度和24小时哌替啶总剂量均无显著变化。硬膜外PCA 24小时后的哌替啶血浆浓度低于静脉PCA [125(标准差108)ng/ml对171(标准差107)ng/ml,P = 0.03],尽管哌替啶剂量无显著差异[平均147(标准差124)mg/24小时]。视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)在术后第2天和第3天之间,或硬膜外组与静脉组静息时无显著差异。然而,硬膜外PCA组咳嗽和腹部触诊时的VAS较低(P = 0.05,0.008)。在0.125%布比卡因硬膜外背景输注的情况下,硬膜外注射哌替啶的PCA比静脉注射哌替啶的PCA能提供更好的疼痛控制,且这是在较低的血浆哌替啶浓度下实现的。

相似文献

1
Patient-controlled epidural versus intravenous pethidine to supplement epidural bupivacaine after abdominal aortic surgery.腹主动脉手术后患者自控硬膜外给药与静脉注射哌替啶补充硬膜外布比卡因的比较。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998 Dec;26(6):630-5. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9802600603.
2
Patient-controlled pethidine after major upper abdominal surgery: comparison of the epidural and intravenous routes.上腹部大手术后患者自控注射哌替啶:硬膜外与静脉途径的比较
Anaesthesia. 2001 Nov;56(11):1106-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01962-4.x.
3
[Postoperative peridural analgesia. Continuous versus patient-controlled administration of a low-dose mixture of sufentanil, clonidine and bupivacaine].[术后硬膜外镇痛。舒芬太尼、可乐定和布比卡因低剂量混合液的持续输注与患者自控给药]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1997 Nov;32(11):659-64. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995132.
4
The minimally effective concentration of adrenaline in a low-concentration thoracic epidural analgesic infusion of bupivacaine, fentanyl and adrenaline after major surgery. A randomized, double-blind, dose-finding study.大手术后布比卡因、芬太尼和肾上腺素低浓度胸段硬膜外镇痛输注中肾上腺素的最低有效浓度。一项随机、双盲、剂量探索性研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Apr;47(4):439-50. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00077.x.
5
Bupivacaine decreases epidural meperidine requirements after abdominal surgery.布比卡因可降低腹部手术后硬膜外哌替啶的需求量。
Can J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;44(4):360-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03014454.
6
[Patient-controlled analgesia with epidural pethidine or buprenorphine plus bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia].[硬膜外哌替啶或丁丙诺啡加布比卡因患者自控镇痛用于术后镇痛]
Masui. 1993 Nov;42(11):1623-7.
7
Continuous epidural analgesia with bupivacaine-fentanyl versus patient-controlled analgesia with i.v. morphine for postoperative pain relief after knee ligament surgery.布比卡因-芬太尼持续硬膜外镇痛与静脉注射吗啡患者自控镇痛用于膝关节韧带手术后的疼痛缓解
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Jan;44(1):37-42. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440107.x.
8
Bupivacaine wound instillation via an electronic patient-controlled analgesia device and a double-catheter system does not decrease postoperative pain or opioid requirements after major abdominal surgery.通过电子患者自控镇痛装置和双导管系统进行布比卡因伤口滴注并不能减轻腹部大手术后的术后疼痛或减少阿片类药物的用量。
Anesth Analg. 2001 Jan;92(1):189-93. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00036.
9
Epidural analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia result in similar rates of postoperative myocardial ischemia after aortic surgery.硬膜外镇痛和静脉自控镇痛在主动脉手术后导致相似的术后心肌缺血发生率。
Anesth Analg. 1997 Dec;85(6):1233-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199712000-00010.
10
Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using pethidine or fentanyl.使用哌替啶或芬太尼的患者自控硬膜外镇痛与患者自控静脉镇痛的比较。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1997 Apr;25(2):126-32. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9702500203.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug interactions with patient-controlled analgesia.患者自控镇痛的药物相互作用。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(1):31-57. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241010-00004.