Tomita S, Ueno H, Takata M, Yasumoto K, Tomoda F, Inoue H
Second Department of Internal Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 1998 Dec;21(4):259-66. doi: 10.1291/hypres.21.259.
To assess whether we could predict left ventricular (LV) geometric patterns on echocardiography from voltages in standard electrocardiograms (ECG) in patients with essential hypertension, standard 12-lead ECG and echocardiograms were recorded in 106 consecutive, untreated patients (50+/-11 yr old) with essential hypertension. Subjects were assigned to the following four groups based on relative wall thickness (RWT) and LV mass index (LVMI) as determined by echocardiography: a normal geometry group (n = 44), a concentric remodeling group (increased RWT and normal LVMI, n = 10), an eccentric hypertrophy group (increased LVMI and normal RWT, n = 23), and a concentric hypertrophy group (increased RWT and LVMI, n = 29). The following ECG variables were determined: Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SV1 = RV5: SL), Cornell voltage (RaVL + SV3: CN), sum of 12-lead QRS voltage (12-lead sum), and RV6/RV5 ratio (RV6/V5). LVMI correlated with SL, CN, and 12-lead sum, but not with RV6/V5 in the study group as a whole. The concentric hypertrophy group showed increased voltages for all ECG variables except RV6/V5. The concentric remodeling group showed increased voltages for SL and 12-lead sum, but a decreased RV6/V5 ratio. In contrast, the eccentric hypertrophy group had increased voltage only for the 12-lead sum. The combination of SL, RV6/V5, and CN showed modest sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of concentric remodeling, concentric hypertrophy, and normal geometry, but not in the diagnosis of eccentric hypertrophy. Conventional ECG criteria can predict LVMI, but not LV geometry in the patients with essential hypertension. The combination of SL, CN, and RV6/V5 is useful in differentiating the four LV geometric patterns seen in essential hypertension.
为评估原发性高血压患者能否根据标准心电图(ECG)电压预测超声心动图上的左心室(LV)几何形态,我们对106例未经治疗的原发性高血压患者(年龄50±11岁)连续记录了标准12导联ECG和超声心动图。根据超声心动图测定的相对室壁厚度(RWT)和左心室质量指数(LVMI),将受试者分为以下四组:正常几何形态组(n = 44)、向心性重构组(RWT增加且LVMI正常,n = 10)、离心性肥厚组(LVMI增加且RWT正常,n = 23)和向心性肥厚组(RWT和LVMI均增加,n = 29)。测定了以下ECG变量:索科洛夫 - 里昂电压(SV1 = RV5:SL)、康奈尔电压(RaVL + SV3:CN)、12导联QRS电压总和(12导联总和)以及RV6/RV5比值(RV6/V5)。在整个研究组中,LVMI与SL、CN和12导联总和相关,但与RV6/V5无关。向心性肥厚组除RV6/V5外,所有ECG变量的电压均升高。向心性重构组SL和12导联总和的电压升高,但RV6/V5比值降低。相比之下,离心性肥厚组仅12导联总和的电压升高。SL、RV6/V5和CN的组合在诊断向心性重构、向心性肥厚和正常几何形态方面具有一定的敏感性和特异性,但在诊断离心性肥厚方面则不然。传统ECG标准可预测原发性高血压患者的LVMI,但不能预测LV几何形态。SL、CN和RV6/V5的组合有助于区分原发性高血压中所见的四种LV几何形态。