Dyer J R, Pilcher C D, Shepard R, Schock J, Eron J J, Fiscus S A
Departments of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Feb;37(2):447-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.2.447-449.1999.
We compared the performance of Organon Teknika's NucliSens and Roche Diagnostic Systems' Monitor quantitative human immunodeficiency type 1 RNA assays. Both had similar linearity and sensitivity over most of the dynamic range of the assays, although the Monitor assay was superior at the low range of RNA values while the NucliSens assay was more consistent at higher RNA values. NucliSens generally showed less interassay variability.
我们比较了欧加农公司的NucliSens和罗氏诊断系统公司的Monitor两种定量检测1型人类免疫缺陷病毒RNA检测方法的性能。在检测的大部分动态范围内,两者的线性和灵敏度相似,不过Monitor检测方法在低RNA值范围内表现更优,而NucliSens检测方法在较高RNA值时更为稳定。总体而言,NucliSens检测方法的批间差异较小。