Suppr超能文献

AMPLICOR HIV-1监测检测版本1.0与1.5之间的一致性评估。

Assessment of agreement between the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR test versions 1.0 and 1.5.

作者信息

Hill Charles E, Green Alicia M, Ingersoll Jessica, Easley Kirk A, Nolte Frederick S, Caliendo Angela M

机构信息

Emory University Hospital and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jan;42(1):286-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.286-289.2004.

Abstract

The agreement of the microwell plate AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.0 (MWP 1.0), the microwell plate AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.5 (MWP 1.5), and the COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.5 (COBAS 1.5) tests was evaluated using clinical specimens and well-characterized control material. Two hundred patient plasma specimens and a panel of known human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) subtypes were tested. All data were log(10) transformed prior to analysis. The 95% limits of agreement for the three tests at the average of 3.66 log(10) copies/ml were +/- 0.28 log(10), +/- 0.34 log(10), and +/- 0.34 log(10) copies/ml for MWP 1.0-MWP 1.5, MWP 1.0-COBAS 1.5, and MWP 1.5-COBAS 1.5, respectively. Ten specimens (6.1%) had differences exceeding the limits of agreement for the MWP 1.0 and MWP 1.5 tests. Correlation coefficients among the three tests were high (r >or=0.96). The viral-load values obtained with the MWP 1.0 test were only 2.1% higher on average than those measured with the MWP 1.5 test and 1.6% higher than those seen with the COBAS 1.5 test. The MWP 1.5 test values were 0.8% higher than the COBAS 1.5 test values. Overall, there was less agreement among the different tests for viral-load values near the lower limit of quantification. The MWP 1.0 test underquantified subtypes A, E, F, G, and H by 1.0 to 2.0 log(10) copies/ml; this problem was not observed with the MWP 1.5 test. The close agreement among the results obtained with the different test versions and formats suggests that it is not necessary to reestablish a baseline viral load when changing AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR tests, unless the patient is known to be infected with a non-B subtype.

摘要

使用临床标本和特征明确的对照材料评估了微孔板AMPLICOR HIV-1监测1.0版(MWP 1.0)、微孔板AMPLICOR HIV-1监测1.5版(MWP 1.5)和COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1监测1.5版(COBAS 1.5)检测的一致性。对200份患者血浆标本和一组已知的人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)亚型进行了检测。所有数据在分析前进行了log(10)转换。在平均3.66 log(10)拷贝/毫升时,MWP 1.0 - MWP 1.5、MWP 1.0 - COBAS 1.5和MWP 1.5 - COBAS 1.5这三种检测的95%一致性界限分别为±0.28 log(10)、±0.34 log(10)和±0.34 log(10)拷贝/毫升。10份标本(6.1%)的差异超过了MWP 1.0和MWP 1.5检测的一致性界限。三种检测之间的相关系数很高(r≥0.96)。MWP 1.0检测获得的病毒载量值平均仅比MWP 1.5检测测量的值高2.1%,比COBAS 1.5检测的值高1.6%。MWP 1.5检测值比COBAS 1.5检测值高0.8%。总体而言,对于接近定量下限的病毒载量值,不同检测之间的一致性较低。MWP 1.0检测对A、E、F、G和H亚型的定量低1.0至2.0 log(10)拷贝/毫升;MWP 1.5检测未观察到这个问题。不同检测版本和形式获得的结果之间的密切一致性表明,除非已知患者感染了非B亚型,否则在更换AMPLICOR HIV-1监测检测时无需重新建立基线病毒载量。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验